The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

Matthew22:23–33

The Sadducees and the Resurrection

✦ Public-domain source — quoted & attributed⚙ AI synthesis — generated, verify

Matthew 22:23–33 — The Sadducees and the Resurrection. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

23

That same day the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to Jesus and questioned Him.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

En ekeinē tē hēmera Saddoukaioi legontes einai mē anastasin prosēlthon autō kai epērōtēsan auton

Word by word14 · parsed
ἘνEnG1722
√ ἐν — "in," at, (up-)on, by, etcPreposition
ἐκείνῃekeinēThatG1565
√ ἐκεῖνος — that one (or (neuter) thing)Demonstrative PronounDative Feminine Singular
τῇtē[same]G3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleDative Feminine Singular
ἡμέρᾳhēmeradayG2250
√ ἡμέρα — day, iNounDative Feminine Singular
ΣαδδουκαῖοιSaddoukaioi[the] SadduceesG4523
√ Σαδδουκαῖος — a Sadducæan (iNounNominative Masculine Plural
Saddoukaios: a Sadducee A rare name in the Greek canon (14 verses). Ellicott notes the party "consisted largely of the upper class of the priesthood" and Pulpit that they were rationalists who denied the future life of the soul outright. Gill preserves the rabbinic origin story from Abot R. Nathan: two disciples of Antigonus of Socho reasoned that no labourer works all day without wages at evening, and concluded there is no other world.
λέγοντεςlegonteswho sayG3004
√ λέγω — properly, to "lay" forth, iVerbPresent Participle ActiveNominative Masculine Plural
legō: to lay forth, to say Present active participle, so a settled, continuing profession rather than one day's remark. Pulpit weighs the variant here and prefers the reading that describes the sect's known position over the one that has them parading it.
εἶναιeinaithere isG1510
√ εἰμί — I exist (used only when emphatic)VerbPresent Infinitive Active
μὴmēnoG3361
√ μή — (adverb) not, (conjunction) lestAdverb
ἀνάστασινanastasinresurrectionG386
√ ἀνάστασις — a standing up again, iNounAccusative Feminine Singular
anastasis: a standing up again The hinge word of the whole unit, occurring four times (vv. 23, 28, 30, 31) and in 40 verses overall. Barnes observes that the Sadducees denied not only the raising of the body but "a future state, and the separate existence of the soul after death altogether, as well as the existence of angels and spirits," citing Acts 23:8; so when Jesus answers with angels (v. 30) and with the living patriarchs (v. 32) He is striking all three denials at once.
προσῆλθονprosēlthoncameG4334
√ προσέρχομαι — to approach, iVerbAorist Indicative Active3rd Person Plural
Aorist of formal approach: the attack is staged as a coming near.
αὐτῷautōto [Jesus]G846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounDative Masculine 3rd Person Singular
καὶkaiandG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
ἐπηρώτησανepērōtēsanquestionedG1905
√ ἐπερωτάω — to ask for, iVerbAorist Indicative Active3rd Person Plural
eperōtaō: to question, interrogate Aorist indicative: a single deliberate interrogation. Gill says they came "with a knotty question, with which they had often puzzled the Pharisees," so the case is a tested weapon, not an improvisation.
αὐτὸνautonHimG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounAccusative Masculine 3rd Person Singular
24

“Teacher,” they said, “Moses declared that if a man dies without having children, his brother is to marry the widow and raise up offspring for him.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

Didaskale legontes Mōusēs eipen Ean tis apothanē mē echōn tekna autou ho adelphos epigambreusei autou tēn gynaika kai anastēsei sperma tō autou adelphō

Word by word23 · parsed
ΔιδάσκαλεDidaskaleTeacherG1320
√ διδάσκαλος — an instructor (genitive case or specially)NounVocative Masculine Singular
λέγοντεςlegontesthey saidG3004
√ λέγω — properly, to "lay" forth, iVerbPresent Participle ActiveNominative Masculine Plural
ΜωϋσῆςMōusēsMosesG3475
√ Μωσεύς — Moseus, Moses, or Mouses (iNounNominative Masculine Singular
Mōuseus: Moses They cite Moses because Moses is the only court they will recognise. Pulpit: "To the books of Moses was always made the ultimate appeal in confirmation of doctrine," and Jesus will answer out of the same five books rather than out of Daniel or Isaiah.
εἶπενeipendeclared thatG2036
√ ἔπω — to speak or say (by word or writing)VerbAorist Indicative Active3rd Person Singular
ἘάνEanifG1437
√ ἐάν — a conditional particleConjunction
τιςtisa manG5100
√ τὶς — some or any person or objectInterrogative / Indefinite PronounNominative Masculine Singular
ἀποθάνῃapothanēdiesG599
√ ἀποθνήσκω — to die off (literally or figuratively)VerbAorist Subjunctive Active3rd Person Singular
μὴmēwithoutG3361
√ μή — (adverb) not, (conjunction) lestAdverb
ἔχωνechōnhavingG2192
√ ἔχω — to hold (used in very various applications, literally or figuratively, direct or remoteVerbPresent Participle ActiveNominative Masculine Singular
τέκναteknachildrenG5043
√ τέκνον — a child (as produced)NounAccusative Neuter Plural
teknon: a child (as produced) Gill, following Aben Ezra and Jarchi, records that the levirate duty lapsed if the dead man left any child at all, son or daughter, or even a grandchild; the Sadducees therefore build their case on a woman who bore nothing to any of the seven, closing the one exit Ellicott says the question was designed to close.
αὐτοῦautouhisG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounGenitive Masculine 3rd Person Singular
ὁhoG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Singular
ἀδελφὸςadelphosbrotherG80
√ ἀδελφός — a brother (literally or figuratively) near or remote (much like G1 (Α))NounNominative Masculine Singular
adelphos: a brother The brother is the legal substitute; Gill notes it was the eldest surviving brother who was bound, and Pulpit that the obligation could be declined at the price of public shame (Deuteronomy 25:7-10).
ἐπιγαμβρεύσειepigambreuseiis to marryG1918
√ ἐπιγαμβρεύω — to form affinity with, iVerbFuture Indicative Active3rd Person Singular
epigambreuō: to form affinity with, to marry as next of kin A Septuagintal verb, extremely rare in the Greek New Testament, and precisely the vocabulary of Deuteronomy 25:5. The word itself is evidence that the questioners are quoting statute, not inventing a scenario.
αὐτοῦautouG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounGenitive Masculine 3rd Person Singular
τὴνtēntheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleAccusative Feminine Singular
γυναῖκαgynaikawidowG1135
√ γυνή — a womanNounAccusative Feminine Singular
καὶkaiandG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
ἀναστήσειanastēseiraise upG450
√ ἀνίστημι — to stand up (literal or figurative, transitive or intransitive)VerbFuture Indicative Active3rd Person Singular
anistēmi: to stand up, to raise up Future indicative. The law's purpose was a kind of resurrection by proxy: the dead man keeps a name and a portion in the land through a son legally reckoned as his. Barnes: the child "shall be reckoned in the genealogy of the deceased brother." The Sadducees hold the shadow of resurrection in their hands while denying the substance.
σπέρμαspermaoffspringG4690
√ σπέρμα — something sown, iNounAccusative Neuter Singular
sperma: seed, that which is sown The covenant word. What the levirate law protects is not sentiment but seed and inheritance, which is why Poole reads the statute as given "for the preservation of the inheritances of the several tribes and families distinct."
τῷtōforG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleDative Masculine Singular
αὐτοῦautouG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounGenitive Masculine 3rd Person Singular
ἀδελφῷadelphō[him]G80
√ ἀδελφός — a brother (literally or figuratively) near or remote (much like G1 (Α))NounDative Masculine Singular
25

Now there were seven brothers among us. The first one married and died without having children. So he left his wife to his brother.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

de ēsan hepta adelphoi par’ hēmin kai ho prōtos gēmas kai eteleutēsen mē echōn sperma aphēken autou tēn gynaika tō autou adelphō

Word by word22 · parsed
δὲdeNowG1161
√ δέ — but, and, etcConjunction
ἦσανēsanthere wereG1510
√ εἰμί — I exist (used only when emphatic)VerbImperfect Indicative Active3rd Person Plural
ἑπτὰheptasevenG2033
√ ἑπτά — sevenAdjectiveNominative Masculine Plural
hepta: seven The number is chosen, not observed: seven is the number of completeness, so the case is pushed to the theoretical limit. Ellicott calls the whole construction a reductio ad absurdum.
ἀδελφοίadelphoibrothersG80
√ ἀδελφός — a brother (literally or figuratively) near or remote (much like G1 (Α))NounNominative Masculine Plural
παρ’par’amongG3844
√ παρά — properly, nearPreposition
ἡμῖνhēminusG1473
√ ἐγώ — I, mePersonal / Possessive PronounDative 1st Person Plural
καὶkaiG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
ὁhoTheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Singular
πρῶτοςprōtosfirst [one]G4413
√ πρῶτος — foremost (in time, place, order or importance)AdjectiveNominative Masculine Singular
prōtos: foremost, first "First" begins a series the hearer is invited to count through to the seventh in v. 26, so the tedium is deliberate.
γήμαςgēmasmarriedG1060
√ γαμέω — to wed (of either sex)VerbAorist Participle ActiveNominative Masculine Singular
καὶkaiandG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
ἐτελεύτησενeteleutēsendiedG5053
√ τελευτάω — to finish life (by implication, of G979 (βίος)), iVerbAorist Indicative Active3rd Person Singular
teleutaō: to finish life Literally to reach the end. Set beside ἀπέθανεν in v. 27 and ἀποθάνῃ in v. 24, Matthew's Greek rings three changes on dying in five verses, and every one of them is a word about cessation.
μὴmēwithoutG3361
√ μή — (adverb) not, (conjunction) lestAdverb
ἔχωνechōnhavingG2192
√ ἔχω — to hold (used in very various applications, literally or figuratively, direct or remoteVerbPresent Participle ActiveNominative Masculine Singular
σπέρμαspermachildrenG4690
√ σπέρμα — something sown, iNounAccusative Neuter Singular
ἀφῆκενaphēken[So] he leftG863
√ ἀφίημι — an intensive form of , to go)VerbAorist Indicative Active3rd Person Singular
aphiēmi: to send away, let go, leave Aorist. The same verb family that elsewhere means release and forgiveness is here used of passing a childless widow down a line of brothers.
αὐτοῦautouhisG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounGenitive Masculine 3rd Person Singular
τὴνtēnG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleAccusative Feminine Singular
γυναῖκαgynaikawifeG1135
√ γυνή — a womanNounAccusative Feminine Singular
τῷtōtoG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleDative Masculine Singular
αὐτοῦautouhisG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounGenitive Masculine 3rd Person Singular
ἀδελφῷadelphōbrotherG80
√ ἀδελφός — a brother (literally or figuratively) near or remote (much like G1 (Α))NounDative Masculine Singular
26

The same thing happened to the second and third brothers, down to the seventh.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

homoiōs kai ho deuteros kai ho tritos heōs tōn hepta

Word by word10 · parsed
ὁμοίωςhomoiōsThe same thing happened toG3668
√ ὁμοίως — similarlyAdverb
homoiōs: similarly, in like manner A verbless adverbial clause. The evangelist lets the Sadducees compress five deaths into one word, which is itself a comment on how cheap human life is in their argument.
καὶkai. . .G2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
ὁhotheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Singular
δεύτεροςdeuterossecondG1208
√ δεύτερος — (ordinal) second (in time, place, or rankAdjectiveNominative Masculine Singular
καὶkaiandG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
ὁhoG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Singular
τρίτοςtritosthird [brothers]G5154
√ τρίτος — thirdAdjectiveNominative Masculine Singular
ἕωςheōsdown toG2193
√ ἕως — a conjunction, preposition and adverb of continuance, until (of time and place)Preposition
heōs: until, as far as Extent, not a stopping point; the phrase reaches across the whole seven.
τῶνtōntheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleGenitive Masculine Plural
ἑπτάheptaseventhG2033
√ ἑπτά — sevenAdjectiveGenitive Masculine Plural
27

And last of all, the woman died.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

de hysteron pantōn hē gynē apethanen

Word by word6 · parsed
δὲdeAndG1161
√ δέ — but, and, etcConjunction
ὕστερονhysteronlastG5305
√ ὕστερον — more lately, iAdverb
hysteron: later, afterward A comparative: after them all. Pulpit records that the following word "also" is omitted by Alford, Tischendorf, and Westcott and Hort, so the shortest text reads simply "last of all the woman died."
πάντωνpantōnof allG3956
√ πᾶς — all, any, every, the wholeAdjectiveGenitive Neuter Plural
ἡhētheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Feminine Singular
γυνήgynēwomanG1135
√ γυνή — a womanNounNominative Feminine Singular
gynē: a woman, wife One noun carries widow, wife and woman. Gill notes she died "a widow and childless," so no husband can claim her by having fathered her child, and the case reaches the point the questioners wanted.
ἀπέθανενapethanendiedG599
√ ἀποθνήσκω — to die off (literally or figuratively)VerbAorist Indicative Active3rd Person Singular
apothnēskō: to die off The aorist closes the story. Everything in the Sadducees' world ends here, which is precisely why they think the next question unanswerable.
28

In the resurrection, then, whose wife will she be of the seven? For all of them were married to her.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

en tē anastasei oun tinos gynē estai tōn hepta gar pantes eschon autēn

Word by word13 · parsed
ἐνenInG1722
√ ἐν — "in," at, (up-)on, by, etcPreposition
τῇtētheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleDative Feminine Singular
ἀναστάσειanastaseiresurrectionG386
√ ἀνάστασις — a standing up again, iNounDative Feminine Singular
anastasis: a standing up again Second of four occurrences. The questioners use the word as a hostile hypothesis; Jesus will use the same word twice (vv. 30, 31) as a fact with its own proper conditions. Cambridge: the logical difficulty vanishes once the analogy between this world and the next is denied at the point where it does not hold.
οὖνounthenG3767
√ οὖν — (adverbially) certainly, or (conjunctionally) accordinglyConjunction
τίνοςtinoswhoseG5101
√ τίς — an interrogative pronoun, who, which or what (in direct or indirect questions)Interrogative / Indefinite PronounGenitive Masculine Singular
tis: who, which, what Genitive of possession. The grammar of the trap is a genitive: the whole case assumes the risen woman must belong to somebody.
γυνήgynēwifeG1135
√ γυνή — a womanNounNominative Feminine Singular
ἔσταιestaiwill she beG1510
√ εἰμί — I exist (used only when emphatic)VerbFuture Indicative Middle3rd Person Singular
Future middle of εἰμί: "she will be," the one future in the question.
τῶνtōnof theG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleGenitive Masculine Plural
ἑπτὰheptasevenG2033
√ ἑπτά — sevenAdjectiveGenitive Masculine Plural
γὰρgarForG1063
√ γάρ — properly, assigning a reason (used in argument, explanation or intensificationConjunction
πάντεςpantesall of themG3956
√ πᾶς — all, any, every, the wholeAdjectiveNominative Masculine Plural
ἔσχονeschonwere marriedG2192
√ ἔχω — to hold (used in very various applications, literally or figuratively, direct or remoteVerbAorist Indicative Active3rd Person Plural
echō: to hold, to have Aorist active, third plural. Poole judges that the design was not to endanger His life, as with the Pharisees' tribute question, but "to have exposed him, by bringing him to an absurdity." Pulpit adds that a rabbinic gloss assigned a twice-married woman to her first husband in the world to come, but that this opinion was not generally received and no rule covered seven.
αὐτήνautēnto herG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounAccusative Feminine 3rd Person Singular
29

Jesus answered, “You are mistaken because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

de ho Iēsous Apokritheis eipen autois Planasthe mē eidotes tas graphas mēde tēn dynamin tou Theou

Word by word16 · parsed
δὲdeG1161
√ δέ — but, and, etcConjunction
ὁhoG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Singular
ἸησοῦςIēsousJesusG2424
√ Ἰησοῦς — Jesus (iNounNominative Masculine Singular
ἈποκριθεὶςApokritheisansweredG611
√ ἀποκρίνομαι — to conclude for oneself, iVerbAorist Participle PassiveNominative Masculine Singular
Aorist passive participle of ἀποκρίνομαι, the formal "answering": Pulpit notes Jesus does not condescend to answer the contemptuous question directly but goes to the root of the error.
εἶπενeipenG2036
√ ἔπω — to speak or say (by word or writing)VerbAorist Indicative Active3rd Person Singular
αὐτοῖςautoisG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounDative Masculine 3rd Person Plural
ΠλανᾶσθεPlanastheYou are mistaken [because]G4105
√ πλανάω — to (properly, cause to) roam (from safety, truth, or virtue)VerbPresent Indicative Middle or Passive2nd Person Plural
planaō: to cause to roam from safety, truth, or virtue Present middle or passive, and the single verb on which the whole rebuke turns. Ellicott observes that this is the one place in the Gospels where Jesus collides directly with the Sadducees, and that His tone is less severe than with the Pharisees, since they were "less characterised by hypocrisy." Pulpit agrees: they are argued with calmly because they have the courage of their opinions.
μὴmēvvvG3361
√ μή — (adverb) not, (conjunction) lestAdverb
εἰδότεςeidotesyou do not knowG1492
√ εἴδω — used only in certain past tenses, the others being borrowed from the equivalent G3700 (ὀπτάνομαι) and G3708 (ὁράω)VerbPerfect Participle ActiveNominative Masculine Plural
eidō: to know, to have seen Perfect active participle. Settled, habitual not-knowing. Gill: they "owned the authority of the Scriptures" and read them, "but then, though they approved of the Scriptures and read them, yet they did not understand them." Literacy is not the same as knowledge.
τὰςtastheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleAccusative Feminine Plural
γραφὰςgraphasScripturesG1124
√ γραφή — a document, iNounAccusative Feminine Plural
graphē: a writing, a document The first of the two ignorances. Barnes notes the irony that Jesus argues from the books of Moses precisely because the Sadducees had appealed to Moses in v. 24, though "other places of the Old Testament, in fact, asserted the doctrine more clearly," naming Daniel 12:2 and Isaiah 26:19.
μηδὲmēdeorG3366
√ μηδέ — but not, not evenConjunction
τὴνtēntheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleAccusative Feminine Singular
δύναμινdynaminpowerG1411
√ δύναμις — force (literally or figuratively)NounAccusative Feminine Singular
dynamis: force, power, ability The second ignorance, and the one that governs v. 30. Barnes reconstructs their objection as a denial that God could regather the scattered dust of the dead, "opposing reason to revelation"; Poole notes that Scripture regularly grounds resurrection faith in divine power, citing Romans 8:11 and Philippians 3:21. To limit what God can do is to have decided in advance what the text is allowed to mean.
τοῦtouG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleGenitive Masculine Singular
ΘεοῦTheouof GodG2316
√ θεός — figuratively, a magistrateNounGenitive Masculine Singular
theos: God Genitive: the power belongs to God, not to our conception of Him.
30

In the resurrection, people will neither marry nor be given in marriage. Instead, they will be like the angels in heaven.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

gar en tē anastasei oute gamousin oute gamizontai all’ eisin hōs angeloi en tō ouranō

Word by word15 · parsed
γὰρgarG1063
√ γάρ — properly, assigning a reason (used in argument, explanation or intensificationConjunction
ἐνenInG1722
√ ἐν — "in," at, (up-)on, by, etcPreposition
τῇtētheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleDative Feminine Singular
ἀναστάσειanastaseiresurrectionG386
√ ἀνάστασις — a standing up again, iNounDative Feminine Singular
anastasis: a standing up again Third occurrence. Cambridge glosses it as "that world or that phase of existence which begins with the resurrection," so the phrase names an order, not a moment.
οὔτεoutevvvG3777
√ οὔτε — not too, iConjunction
γαμοῦσινgamousin[people] will neither marryG1060
√ γαμέω — to wed (of either sex)VerbPresent Indicative Active3rd Person Plural
gameō: to wed (of either sex) Present active. The Verifier finds this same lexeme (25 verses) in Matthew 24:38 and Luke 17:27, where marrying and being given in marriage mark the generation of Noah going about its business up to the flood. The age that marries is by definition the age that must replace its dead.
οὔτεoutenorG3777
√ οὔτε — not too, iConjunction
γαμίζονταιgamizontaibe given in marriageG1061
√ γαμίσκω — to espouse (a daughter to a husband)VerbPresent Indicative Middle or Passive3rd Person Plural
gamiskō: to give in marriage A rare verb (7 verses), present middle or passive. Pulpit quotes an old Father to the point: "Where the law of death is abolished, the cause of birth is abolished likewise." Marriage in this sense is an institution of a world that buries people.
ἀλλ’all’InsteadG235
√ ἀλλά — properly, other things, iConjunction
εἰσινeisinthey will beG1510
√ εἰμί — I exist (used only when emphatic)VerbPresent Indicative Active3rd Person Plural
Present indicative of εἰμί with ὡς: a comparison of state, not a promise of transformation into angelic nature.
ὡςhōslikeG5613
√ ὡς — which how, iAdverb
ἄγγελοιangeloi[the] angelsG32
√ ἄγγελος — compare G34 (ἀγέλη)) (to bring tidings)NounNominative Masculine Plural
angelos: a messenger The comparison is limited and the commentators are careful about its limits. Barnes: the likeness is "in the circumstances of their existence," not in intellect. Gill: the saints will not be incorporeal as angels are, will not need food, and will not marry. Geneva: they will be as angels only in that they neither marry nor are married. Ellicott presses further, that the old relations may subsist under new conditions, which is inference rather than exegesis and should be weighed as such.
ἐνeninG1722
√ ἐν — "in," at, (up-)on, by, etcPreposition
τῷtōG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleDative Masculine Singular
οὐρανῷouranōheavenG3772
√ οὐρανός — the skyNounDative Masculine Singular
ouranos: the sky, heaven Locative dative: the angels who dwell there. The phrase quietly asserts the existence of the very order the Sadducees denied.
31

But concerning the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what God said to you:

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

de peri tēs anastaseōs tōn nekrōn ouk anegnōte to hypo tou Theou rhēthen hymin legontos

Word by word15 · parsed
δὲdeButG1161
√ δέ — but, and, etcConjunction
περὶpericoncerningG4012
√ περί — properly, through (all over), iPreposition
τῆςtēstheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleGenitive Feminine Singular
ἀναστάσεωςanastaseōsresurrectionG386
√ ἀνάστασις — a standing up again, iNounGenitive Feminine Singular
anastasis: a standing up again Fourth and last occurrence, and the first time in the dialogue that Jesus rather than His questioners sets the terms of the subject.
τῶνtōnof theG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleGenitive Masculine Plural
νεκρῶνnekrōndeadG3498
√ νεκρός — dead (literally or figurativelyAdjectiveGenitive Masculine Plural
nekros: dead (literally or figuratively) The genitive phrase ἀνάστασις τῶν νεκρῶν, resurrection of dead ones, is the doctrinal formula the Verifier also finds in Hebrews 6:2, where it stands among the foundational teachings.
οὐκoukvvvG3756
√ οὐ — the absolute negative (compare G3361 (μή)) adverbAdverb
ἀνέγνωτεanegnōtehave you not readG314
√ ἀναγινώσκω — to know again, iVerbAorist Indicative Active2nd Person Plural
anaginōskō: to know again, to read Aorist with οὐκ: a blunt "did you not read?" Pulpit presses the point that knowing the letter is inadequate, that "the key to the interpretation of the Scripture is faith," and that the Sadducees held a Pentateuch whose plainest words they had never heard.
τὸtowhatG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleAccusative Neuter Singular
ὑπὸhypoG5259
√ ὑπό — under, iPreposition
τοῦtouG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleGenitive Masculine Singular
ΘεοῦTheouGodG2316
√ θεός — figuratively, a magistrateNounGenitive Masculine Singular
theos: God The agent, with ὑπό: the saying is spoken by God. Ellicott notes that Mark and Luke add "at the bush," probably naming the section of the Law containing Exodus 3 by its traditional title.
ῥηθὲνrhēthensaidG2046
√ ἐρέω — an alternate for G2036 (ἔπω) in certain tensesVerbAorist Participle PassiveAccusative Neuter Singular
ereō: to speak, to say Aorist passive participle, substantival. A completed utterance that remains addressed; the tense is past and the address is present.
ὑμῖνhyminto youG4771
√ σύ — thouPersonal / Possessive PronounDative 2nd Person Plural
λέγοντοςlegontosG3004
√ λέγω — properly, to "lay" forth, iVerbPresent Participle ActiveGenitive Masculine Singular
32

‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? He is not the God of the dead, but of the living.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

Egō eimi ho Theos Abraam kai ho Theos Isaak kai ho Theos Iakōb estin ouk ho Theos nekrōn alla zōntōn

Word by word20 · parsed
ἘγώEgōIG1473
√ ἐγώ — I, mePersonal / Possessive PronounNominative 1st Person Singular
egō: I The emphatic pronoun, unnecessary in Greek and therefore deliberate. The citation is of Exodus 3:6 and 3:15, the words at the burning bush, as Barnes, Poole and Pulpit all note.
εἰμιeimiamG1510
√ εἰμί — I exist (used only when emphatic)VerbPresent Indicative Active1st Person Singular
eimi: I exist, I am Present indicative. The entire proof hangs on a copula. Benson: "our Lord's application of the citation in the present tense plainly implies that no other tense of the verb can be supplied," and he cites the Septuagint of Exodus 3:6 for the form.
ὁhotheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Singular
ΘεὸςTheosGodG2316
√ θεός — figuratively, a magistrateNounNominative Masculine Singular
ἈβραὰμAbraamof AbrahamG11
√ Ἀβραάμ — Abraham, the Hebrew patriarchNounGenitive Masculine Singular
Abraam: Abraham Barnes reckons Abraham dead 329 years, Isaac 224, and Jacob 198 when these words were spoken, so no living hearer is meant. Gill records that the Sadducees expressly denied that resurrection could be proved from the Law, and that rabbinic disputants before Jesus had tried Exodus 6:4, Deuteronomy 31:16 and Deuteronomy 4:4 to the same end; Jesus chooses a covenant text rather than a proof text.
καὶkaiG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
ὁhotheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Singular
ΘεὸςTheosGodG2316
√ θεός — figuratively, a magistrateNounNominative Masculine Singular
ἸσαὰκIsaakof IsaacG2464
√ Ἰσαάκ — Isaac (iNounGenitive Masculine Singular
καὶkaiandG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
ὁhotheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Singular
ΘεὸςTheosGodG2316
√ θεός — figuratively, a magistrateNounNominative Masculine Singular
ἸακώβIakōbof JacobG2384
√ Ἰακώβ — Jacob (iNounGenitive Masculine Singular
ἔστινestinHe isG1510
√ εἰμί — I exist (used only when emphatic)VerbPresent Indicative Active3rd Person Singular
eimi: to be Present, third singular, with οὐκ: the tense is the argument. Cambridge reduces it to a syllogism, and then goes deeper, that the proposition rests "upon the close relation between the life of God and the life of His children," illustrated by the vine of John 15:1-8: if the vine lives its branches live.
οὐκouknotG3756
√ οὐ — the absolute negative (compare G3361 (μή)) adverbAdverb
ὁhotheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Singular
ΘεὸςTheosGodG2316
√ θεός — figuratively, a magistrateNounNominative Masculine Singular
νεκρῶνnekrōnof [the] deadG3498
√ νεκρός — dead (literally or figurativelyAdjectiveGenitive Masculine Plural
nekros: dead Anarthrous genitive plural. Barnes puts the absurdity plainly: it is absurd to say God rules over those who are extinct or annihilated.
ἀλλὰallabutG235
√ ἀλλά — properly, other things, iConjunction
ζώντωνzōntōnof [the] livingG2198
√ ζάω — to live (literally or figuratively)VerbPresent Participle ActiveGenitive Masculine Plural
zaō: to live Present active participle, genitive plural. Cambridge is honest that this proves immortality directly and resurrection only by inference: if the patriarchs live, they live awaiting a resurrection, and he points to Hebrews 11:16. Poole records that Cardinal Perron and Maldonatus denied the bodily resurrection could be proved here at all without church tradition, and answers them with five observations from the grammar and the covenant formula.
33

When the crowds heard this, they were astonished at His teaching.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

Kai hoi ochloi akousantes exeplēssonto epi autou tē didachē

Word by word9 · parsed
ΚαὶKaiWhenG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
οἱhoitheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Plural
ὄχλοιochloicrowdsG3793
√ ὄχλος — a throng (as borne along)NounNominative Masculine Plural
ochlos: a throng, a crowd Plural. Matthew regularly makes the crowds the witnesses of Jesus' authority; here they are the jury before whom a party of priestly rationalists is publicly defeated.
ἀκούσαντεςakousantesheard [this]G191
√ ἀκούω — to hear (in various senses)VerbAorist Participle ActiveNominative Masculine Plural
Aorist participle: one hearing, whose effect the following imperfect draws out.
ἐξεπλήσσοντοexeplēssontothey were astonishedG1605
√ ἐκπλήσσω — to strike with astonishmentVerbImperfect Indicative Middle or Passive3rd Person Plural
ekplēssō: to strike with astonishment Imperfect middle or passive: they went on being stunned. Gill notes that Luke records the sequel, that after this the Sadducees "durst not ask him any question at all," while certain scribes said "Master, thou hast well said." Ellicott observes the same double reaction, astonishment in Matthew and agreement in Mark 12:28 and Luke 20:39.
ἐπὶepiatG1909
√ ἐπί — properly, meaning superimposition (of time, place, order, etcPreposition
αὐτοῦautouHisG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounGenitive Masculine 3rd Person Singular
τῇtēG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleDative Feminine Singular
διδαχῇdidachēteachingG1322
√ διδαχή — instruction (the act or the matter)NounDative Feminine Singular
didachē: instruction, the act or the matter Dative with ἐπί: they were stunned at His teaching. Pulpit reads the amazement as threefold: the interpretation was new to them, it opened depths in a Scripture they knew only by the letter, and it showed that He saw the motive behind the question.

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

⚙

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. The trap built out of Moses — 22:23-28

The attack comes from a different quarter than the last. Ellicott records that the Sadducees "consisted largely of the upper class of the priesthood," and that "they rested their denial on the ground that they found no mention of it in the Law, which they recognised as the only rule of faith." Pulpit calls them rationalists and sceptics; Barnes, citing Acts 23:8, insists that what they denied was not merely the raising of the body but "a future state, and the separate existence of the soul after death altogether, as well as the existence of angels and spirits." Benson goes further, reporting Dr. Campbell's judgment that ἀνάστασις should here be rendered "future life," since otherwise the Lord's answer would not touch the doctrine He means to refute. ⚙ The weapon they bring is the levirate statute of Deuteronomy 25:5-6, and the Greek betrays how carefully it was chosen: the verb ἐπιγαμβρεύσει (v. 24) is the rare Septuagintal term Pulpit glosses as "to take a woman to wife as the husband's kinsman," and the second verb is ἀναστήσει, "he shall raise up." They deny the standing up again in v. 23 and then quote a law whose whole purpose was to raise up a name from the dead. Gill, out of Aben Ezra and Jarchi, notes that the duty lapsed if any child at all survived, which is why the story insists seven times on childlessness; Ellicott says the stress on barrenness was laid precisely "to guard against the possible answer that she would be counted in the resurrection as the wife of him to whom she had borne issue." Poole's verdict on the finished construction: "Instead of discovering their acuteness, and putting our Saviour upon a difficulty, they did but betray their own ignorance as to the state of the resurrection." Pulpit, less patiently, finds in it "a levity and a coarseness which is simply revolting."

ii. Two ignorances, and the first correction — 22:29-30

The reply names two failures, and Ellicott sets them out as the commentators generally do: "(1) an imperfect knowledge even of the Scriptures which they recognised; (2) imperfect conceptions of the divine attributes, and therefore an à priori limitation of the divine power." The verb is Πλανᾶσθε, present and middle or passive, from πλανάω, to be made to roam from safety or truth: not a miscalculation but a wandering. ⚙ Note which error Jesus corrects first. He does not begin with Scripture; He begins with power, because the Sadducees' reading of Scripture was already governed by their estimate of what God could do. Barnes diagnoses the method exactly: "The way in which the enemies of the truth often attempt to make a doctrine of the Bible ridiculous is by adding to it, and then calling it absurd." The addition was the assumption that the coming world reproduces this one. Against it stand two present-tense verbs, γαμοῦσιν and γαμίζονται, the one active for the man and, as Pulpit notes, the passive for the woman given away by her family: the whole apparatus of marriage, described as absent. Pulpit supplies the reason from an unnamed Father: "Where the law of death is abolished, the cause of birth is abolished likewise." The commentators then guard the angel comparison with one voice and from several directions. Geneva: "He does not say that they will be without bodies, for then they would not be men any more." Barnes: the likeness is in the circumstances of existence, not in intellect. Gill: not incorporeal, not needing food, not marrying, and he collects the rabbinic parallels, including the saying from Berakot that in the world to come there is neither eating nor drinking nor increase of children. Cambridge states the logical principle underneath: "The danger of the argument from analogy always lies in the fallacy that the things compared are alike at each point." Ellicott alone presses past what the verse says, suggesting that "the old relations may subsist under new conditions"; that is inference offered pastorally, and should be received as inference.

iii. The tense of the bush — 22:31-32

Now the second ignorance, and the proof is fetched from the only court the Sadducees will sit in. Pulpit: "but the Sadducees had drawn their objection from the Pentateuch, therefore from that section of the Bible he refutes them." Ellicott notes that Mark and Luke add "at the bush," probably naming the section of the Law containing Exodus 3 by its traditional title, and he is candid that other passages speak more clearly, listing Job 19:25-26, Psalm 16:10-11 and Daniel 12:2; Barnes names Daniel 12:2 and Isaiah 26:19 to the same effect. ⚙ The verb for reading is ἀνέγνωτε, from ἀναγινώσκω, to know again: they had the words and never re-cognised them. And the words were spoken ὑμῖν, "to you," though Moses heard them at Horeb; Gill says they "were designed for the use, instruction, and comfort of the Israelites" in every generation, and Pulpit that Christ "intimates that it was the voice of God to all time." Then the proof itself, resting on a copula. Poole's first observation: "God doth not say I have been, but I am." Benson notes that the emphatic "I am" is absent from the Hebrew of Exodus 3:6 but present in the Septuagint, and that the present tense of Jesus' own comment, οὐκ ἔστιν ὁ Θεὸς Θεὸς νεκρῶν, settles which tense must be supplied. Barnes reckons Abraham 329 years dead, Isaac 224, Jacob 198, when God still called Himself their God. Cambridge states the syllogism and then goes beneath it: the proposition rests "upon the close relation between the life of God and the life of His children," illustrated by the vine of John 15, for if the vine lives its branches live. Cambridge is also the most honest about the limits: "So far there has been proof of immortality. The argument for the Resurrection is inferred." Poole, against Cardinal Perron and Maldonatus, argues that the bodily resurrection follows too, since the covenant formula "the God of" names God as Benefactor, since Abraham, Isaac and Jacob means their entire persons and not a part, and since the promises of the land were made to them personally and never enjoyed; he ends where Hebrews 11:16 ends, with a city prepared. Gill draws the same line from the covenant: "as their souls now live with God, their bodies also will be raised from the dead."

iv. The crowds, and the silence — 22:33

The verdict is given by the wrong people. Not the Sanhedrin but οἱ ὄχλοι, the crowds, and the verb is ἐξεπλήσσοντο, imperfect: they went on being struck out of themselves. Ellicott judges the cause precisely: "It was the mode of teaching rather than the doctrine taught that astonished them," the wonder being that the popular creed had been proved from words a careless reader would think remote from it; and he notes that Mark 12:28 and Luke 20:39 record agreement as well as amazement, the better Pharisees pleased to hear their opponents answered with more dexterity than their own ablest scribes. Gill gives the two sequels from Luke together: the Sadducees "durst not ask him any question at all," and certain scribes said "Master, thou hast well said." ⚙ Cambridge and Ellicott both correct the older English here: διδαχῇ is teaching, the act, not doctrine as a system. What stunned the temple court was a method, one that read a covenant formula for its tense and found the resurrection inside a verb.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested against the text. The Sadducees asked a question about ownership: of which of the seven will she be wife? Every word of it assumes that persons in the age to come are still property and still perishable, that the world to come must be this world with the deaths removed. Jesus does not solve their puzzle. He dissolves the premise, and He does it in the order the error was built: power first, then Scripture. That order is the pastoral heart of the passage. A doctrine of God that has already decided what God may do will read the Bible accurately and still not know it, which is exactly Gill's observation that they approved the Scriptures and read them and did not understand them. The proof, when it comes, is not a prediction but a present tense. God says Ἐγώ εἰμι, I am, over three men long buried, and Poole's five observations all hang on that one grammatical fact. This is the most striking thing in the unit: Jesus does not argue that God will raise the dead. He argues that God is their God, which means the dead are already in a living relation He will not leave half-honoured. Cambridge is right to say the resurrection is here inferred rather than proved, and honesty requires saying so; but the inference is not weak. It runs from covenant to body, as Poole and Gill both run it: God bound Himself to whole persons, and bodies were part of the labour, so bodies will be part of the reward. One further ⚙ observation the commentators do not make and that I offer tentatively. The trap was built from a law about raising up seed, a statute whose entire function was to keep a dead man's name alive in the land. The Sadducees therefore chose, out of all the Law, the one provision that is an admission that death is intolerable and must somehow be answered. They handed Him a shadow of resurrection and asked Him to disprove the substance. The following line is my own summary sentence and not Scripture: the levirate law was Israel's confession that death should not have the last word, made by men who insisted that it did.

God did not say I was their God; He said I am, and the tense of a covenant outlives the grave it is spoken over.

⚙

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The same interrogation in Mark and Luke verbal / quotation: confirmed

All three Synoptics carry this encounter, and the Verifier's shared lexemes are dense: ἀνάστασις (G386), Σαδδουκαῖος (G4523), ἐπερωτάω (G1905), γαμέω (G1060) and the rare γαμίσκω (G1061). Luke 20:34-35 adds the contrast Ellicott builds on, between the children of this age and those accounted worthy of that age; Poole assembles Luke's additions in full, that they neither die any more, that they are equal to the angels, that they are children of God being children of the resurrection. JFB, characteristically, refers the whole block to the exposition at Mark 12:13-34 rather than repeating it.

Mark 12:18 · Mark 12:25 · Mark 12:26 · Luke 20:27 · Luke 20:34 · Luke 20:35

basis: Verifier-computed shared Greek lexemes across all Greek pairs, including the rare G1061 γαμίσκω (in 7 vv) at Luke 20:34 and G4523 Σαδδουκαῖος (in 14 vv) at Mark 12:18 and Luke 20:27, alongside G386 ἀνάστασις (in 40 vv), G1905 ἐπερωτάω (in 56 vv) and G1060 γαμέω (in 25 vv); these are parallel Greek reports of one conversation, so the verbal tier is available and all refs are New Testament

The levirate statute they quote structural / thematic: confirmed

Verse 24 cites Moses explicitly: "if a man dies without having children, his brother is to marry the widow and raise up offspring for him." The statute is Deuteronomy 25:5-6; Genesis 38:8 shows the duty already assumed before Sinai, in Judah's charge to Onan, and Ruth 4:5-10 shows it worked out at the gate of Bethlehem through the kinsman-redeemer. Barnes: "This law was given by Moses in order to keep the families and tribes of the Israelites distinct, and to perpetuate them." Cambridge, quoting the Speaker's Commentary, notes the practice "is not peculiar to the Jews, but is found amongst various Oriental nations, ancient and modern," and Pulpit lists Persians, Egyptians, Arabians, Druses and Circassians. Pulpit also records that the obligation could be refused at the cost of public shame (Deuteronomy 25:7-10), and that Gill's rabbinic sources restrict it further.

Deuteronomy 25:5 · Genesis 38:8 · Ruth 4:5

basis: An explicit citation of Moses named in the BSB text of v. 24 and identified as Deuteronomy 25:5-6 by Barnes, Gill, Poole, Cambridge and Pulpit; the verbal tier is unavailable because this is a Greek to Hebrew pair that shares no computable Strong's lexeme, the contact being the rare Septuagintal verb G1918 ἐπιγαμβρεύω rendering the Hebrew statute

The words at the bush structural / thematic: confirmed

Verse 31 says "have you not read what God said to you" and v. 32 quotes it: "I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob." The source is Exodus 3:6, with the same formula repeated at Exodus 3:15-16. Ellicott notes that Mark and Luke add "at the bush," probably a reference to the section of the Law known by that title; Pulpit points to Exodus 3:14 for the name as that of "the Eternal, Self-existent One." Benson's contribution is textual: the emphatic "I am" is absent from the Hebrew of Exodus 3:6 and present in the Septuagint, Ἐγώ εἰμι ὁ Θεὸς τοῦ πατρός σου, and the present tense of Jesus' comment shows no other tense may be supplied. Poole extends the covenant reading to the land promises made personally to each patriarch (Genesis 13:15, Genesis 26:3, Genesis 35:12, Exodus 6:4) and never enjoyed in this life.

Exodus 3:6 · Exodus 3:15 · Genesis 13:15

basis: An explicit quotation, marked as such in the BSB text of vv. 31-32 and identified as Exodus 3:6 and 3:15 by Barnes, Gill, Benson, Ellicott, Poole and Pulpit; the verbal tier is unavailable because a Greek to Hebrew pair shares no computable Strong's lexeme, and the Greek here follows the Septuagint rather than the Hebrew in supplying Ἐγώ εἰμι

The hope the Sadducees would not read structural / thematic: confirmed

Jesus answers from the Pentateuch because that is where His questioners stood, but the commentators are careful to say the Old Testament speaks more plainly elsewhere. Barnes: "Other places of the Old Testament, in fact, asserted the doctrine more clearly Daniel 12:2; Isaiah 26:19, but he wished to meet them on their own ground." Ellicott adds Job 19:25-26 and Psalm 16:10-11 to the list, saying the hope of immortality and even of a resurrection is there "expressed with greater clearness." Hosea 13:14 belongs with them as the taunt against death and Sheol. Pulpit explains why none of these was usable in this argument: "The utterances of the prophets were explained away as allegorical, poetical, and rhetorical; the plain, historical statements of the Law could not at that time be thus treated."

Daniel 12:2 · Isaiah 26:19 · Job 19:25 · Psalm 16:10 · Hosea 13:14

basis: A shared doctrine, not a quotation: these references are named as clearer Old Testament witnesses to resurrection by Barnes (Daniel 12:2, Isaiah 26:19) and Ellicott (Job 19:25-26, Psalm 16:10-11, Daniel 12:2), with Hosea 13:14 added as the same motif; the verbal tier is unavailable because every pair here is Greek to Hebrew and shares no computable Strong's lexeme

"Neither resurrection, nor angel, nor spirit" structural / thematic: confirmed

Luke's report of the Sadducean creed in Acts 23:8 is the standing gloss on this chapter, and Barnes, Poole, Gill and Pulpit all reach for it. Pulpit quotes it as "the popular account of their religious belief." It explains why Jesus' answer moves through angels (v. 30) on the way to the patriarchs (v. 32): as Gill puts it, "Christ, by making mention of angels, strikes at another notion of the Sadducees, that there were no angels." Acts 23:6 shows Paul dividing the same council on the same word.

Acts 23:8 · Acts 23:6

basis: Verifier-computed shared Greek lexemes G386 ἀνάστασις (in 40 vv) and the relatively rare G4523 Σαδδουκαῖος (in 14 vv) at both Acts 23:6 and Acts 23:8; a real verbal contact inside a shared motif rather than a quotation, so the tier is deliberately held at structural rather than verbal

The age that marries and the age that does not structural / thematic: confirmed

⚙ The Verifier links v. 30 to Matthew 24:38 and Luke 17:27 through γαμέω (G1060): in the days before the flood they were "marrying and giving in marriage," the ordinary business of a world under sentence. Set beside v. 30, the same verb marks the boundary between the two ages. Pulpit's quotation of an unnamed Father states the logic: "Where the law of death is abolished, the cause of birth is abolished likewise." Luke 20:34-35, in Poole's summary, names the two sides directly, the children of this world who marry and those accounted worthy of that world who do not, because they cannot die any more. ⚙ The inference from the shared verb is mine and is offered as a pattern, not as a claim that Matthew 24:38 is in view here.

Matthew 24:38 · Luke 17:27 · Luke 20:34

basis: Verifier-computed shared Greek lexeme G1060 γαμέω (in 25 vv) at Matthew 24:38, Luke 17:27 and Luke 20:34, with G1061 γαμίσκω (in 7 vv) at Luke 20:34; a genuine verbal contact within a shared motif of the two ages, not a quotation, so held at structural

Like the angels in heaven structural / thematic: confirmed

The comparison in v. 30 assumes a heavenly host the questioners denied. Psalm 103:20 describes the angels as mighty ones who do God's word and hearken to the voice of it; Daniel 7:10 sets ten thousand times ten thousand standing before the throne. ⚙ The point of resemblance the commentators allow is narrow, and they are unanimous about the narrowness: Geneva that it concerns marriage only, Barnes that it concerns the circumstances of existence and not intellect, Gill that the saints will not be incorporeal. Read with those limits, the comparison says that the risen live an undying, undiminished life of service, which is what the angelic texts describe, and Gill collects the rabbinic sayings that already compared the righteous in the world to come to the ministering angels.

Psalm 103:20 · Daniel 7:10

basis: A shared motif of the heavenly host, not a citation: v. 30 makes no quotation claim and the commentators (Gill, Geneva, Barnes, Pulpit) treat the angel comparison as doctrinal rather than scriptural allusion; the verbal tier is unavailable because these are Greek to Hebrew pairs with no computable shared Strong's lexeme

Resurrection of the dead as a foundation structural / thematic: confirmed

The phrase Jesus uses in v. 31, ἀνάστασις τῶν νεκρῶν, becomes a fixed formula in the apostolic writings, and the Verifier surfaces Hebrews 6:2, where "resurrection of the dead" stands among the elementary teachings a believer is not to keep relaying. ⚙ That the phrase hardened into a catechetical item is a fact of usage rather than an argument from this text, and it is offered only as that.

Hebrews 6:2

basis: Verifier-computed shared Greek lexeme G386 ἀνάστασις (in 40 vv), counted three times at Hebrews 6:2; a shared technical phrase in a Greek to Greek pair, but not a quotation of this passage, so the tier is held at structural rather than verbal

The kinsman who raises up seed for the dead typological

⚙ A figural reading, offered to be tested. The statute the Sadducees quote requires a living kinsman to take a dead man's widow and give him a name and an inheritance he can no longer claim for himself; Barnes notes that the child so born "shall be reckoned in the genealogy of the deceased brother," and Pulpit that "the natural and the legal paternities are seen in the genealogies of our Lord." Ruth 4:5-10 is the working case, where Boaz buys the field and the widow together so that the name of the dead is not cut off, and Ruth 4:17-22 runs that restored line down to David. Isaiah 53:10 says of the suffering Servant that he shall see his seed. ⚙ The pattern I read here, and it is mine rather than any commentator's in this brief: the law's answer to a dead man without seed was a kinsman who acted in his place, and the answer to a dead race without seed is a kinsman who does the same. The identification of Boaz as a figure of the Redeemer is ancient and widely held; the specific link of the levirate obligation in v. 24 to the Servant's seed in Isaiah 53:10 is my own extension and is not asserted by any voice in this brief.

Ruth 4:10 · Ruth 4:17 · Isaiah 53:10

basis: A figural reading, not a verbal link: the levirate statute cited in v. 24 (Deuteronomy 25:5-6) is enacted at Ruth 4:5-10 by a kinsman-redeemer, a figure of Christ that is ancient and widely held, while the further tie to the Servant's seed at Isaiah 53:10 is this tool's own novel extension and is marked as such in the body; the verbal tier is unavailable in any case because these are Greek to Hebrew pairs with no computable shared Strong's lexeme

⚙Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

The God of the living, and the firstfruits of them that slept ancient/widely-held

Matthew Henry takes the passage straight into redemptive history: the doctrine of the resurrection "was kept for a more full revelation, after the resurrection of Christ, who was the first-fruits of them that slept," the phrase drawn from 1 Corinthians 15:20. ⚙ The logic of v. 32 requires that finish. Jesus proves that God holds a living relation to buried men, which Cambridge grants is a proof of immortality with the resurrection inferred; what turns the inference into a fact is a tomb actually emptied. Poole reaches the same place from the covenant side, ending with Hebrews 11:16: what makes God truly called their God is that "he hath prepared for them a city, which city they could never possess without a resurrection." Pulpit closes his note on v. 32 with Romans 14:8-9, that Christ died and rose "that he might be the Lord both of the dead and living," which is the same claim as this verse with a name attached. Gill draws the covenant line through to the body: "as their souls now live with God, their bodies also will be raised from the dead."

1 Corinthians 15:20 · Hebrews 11:16 · Romans 14:8 · Romans 14:9

The power they did not know ancient/widely-held

The first ignorance named in v. 29 is of δύναμις, power, and Poole notes that Scripture consistently grounds resurrection faith in that power, citing Romans 8:11, that the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus will quicken our mortal bodies, and Philippians 3:21, that He will transfigure the body of our humiliation to the body of His glory. ⚙ So the answer to the Sadducees' second error is not an abstract omnipotence but a specific, already exercised act: the power in question is the power that raised Jesus, and the pattern of the risen body is His. Barnes reconstructs their objection as the claim that God could not regather the scattered dust of the dead; Cambridge answers that the power of God "is able to effect the resurrection, and after the resurrection to create a new order of things in the new world." That new order is what Paul calls the spiritual body, and Pulpit describes it as "changing the natural into the spiritual, and transforming the characteristics of the life that now is into a different and higher sphere, yet preserving identity."

Romans 8:11 · Philippians 3:21 · 1 Corinthians 15:22

The I AM of the bush, standing in the temple court novel

⚙ This reading is offered tentatively and is not drawn from the commentators in this brief. Pulpit's sourced observation is that ἐγώ εἰμι in v. 32 is the name in which God "gives himself this name, as the Eternal, Self-existent One," pointing to Exodus 3:14; Benson's is that the emphatic "I am" stands in the Septuagint of Exodus 3:6. ⚙ What I notice beyond them is who is quoting it. The one who says "have you not read what God said to you" and then repeats the bush formula is the same teacher who says elsewhere, before Abraham was, I am (John 8:58). Matthew does not draw the line, and no voice in this brief draws it here, so I mark it as my own: the words that prove the patriarchs living are spoken in the temple by the one whose name they are, and in three days the argument from a present tense will be demonstrated in a body.

Exodus 3:14 · John 8:58 · John 15:1

The vine and its branches ancient/widely-held

Cambridge supplies the christological ground for "God is not the God of the dead": the proposition "depends upon the close relation between the life of God and the life of His children. The best illustration of the truth is the parable of the Vine (John 15:1-8). The connection between the living God and the patriarchs, whose God He is, is as close as that between the vine and its branches. If the vine lives its branches live." ⚙ Cambridge does not name Christ as the vine in that sentence, but the parable he cites does, and the consequence is worth stating plainly: the reason Abraham cannot stay dead is not something in Abraham. It is union with a life that does not end, and in John that life has a face.

John 15:1 · John 15:8

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, — (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

Text: BSB (CC0) with the Berean interlinear and Strong's numbering; the Greek surfaces, parses and lexeme glosses above are taken from that apparatus and not adjusted. Two text-critical items are recorded by the sources themselves and neither is resolved here. At v. 23 Pulpit reports a division between οἱ λέγοντες, which describes the Sadducees' standing position, and bare λέγοντες, which has them announcing it on the spot, and prefers the former on non-literary grounds; the interlinear in this brief carries λέγοντες. At v. 27 Pulpit notes that "also" is omitted by Alford, Tischendorf, and Westcott and Hort. At v. 30 Pulpit records that τοῦ Θεοῦ, "of God," after "angels" is absent from some manuscripts and editors, and the interlinear here reads simply ἄγγελοι ἐν τῷ οὐρανῷ.

Sources: nine of the ten commentators in this brief are quoted somewhere in the unit. JFB is not, because every JFB entry for these eleven verses is a cross-reference to the exposition at Mark 12:13-34 and carries no comment that could be excerpted; JFB is named in the threads for that reason. Henry's note is one block covering vv. 23-33, and Barnes' and Poole's notes are likewise written across ranges rather than single verses, so an excerpt anchored on one verse may be expounding a neighbouring one; this is flagged in the editorial notes where it matters. Gill's rabbinic citations (Abot R. Nathan, Yebamot, Berakot, Maimonides, Aben Ezra, Jarchi) describe later Jewish administration and opinion, not the text of Deuteronomy or Exodus, and should be weighed as such. Gill's "reigned case" at v. 25 is the period spelling of "feigned" and is preserved verbatim.

What is uncertain. Benson's rendering of ἀνάστασις as "future life," following Dr. Campbell, is a real minority reading of the word and is reported here as his, not endorsed. Ellicott's suggestion at v. 30 that "the old relations may subsist under new conditions" answers a pastoral question this verse does not raise and is inference, as Pulpit independently concedes when he says the Lord "says nothing here concerning mutual recognition in the future state." Cambridge's admission that the argument of v. 32 proves immortality directly and resurrection only by inference is the most exact statement of the case in this brief, and it is preferred here over any stronger claim; Poole's five-point answer to Cardinal Perron and Maldonatus is recorded as the counter-argument, not as a settled result. Barnes' figures of 329, 224 and 198 years are his own chronological reckoning. The Pulpit Commentary's "old Father" at v. 30 is unnamed in the source and the attribution cannot be checked from it. Every cross-Testament thread in this unit is tiered structural or typological, never verbal, because a Greek to Hebrew pair shares no computable Strong's lexeme; the basis lines say so in each case. The ⚙ synthesis in the sola reading, in the final movement, and in the third and fourth christ entries is this tool's own fallible work and is marked where it goes beyond the sourced voices.

✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)