Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Tote ho Iēsous anēchthē hypo tou Pneumatos eis tēn erēmon peirasthēnai hypo tou diabolou
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Temptation of Jesus
Matthew 4:1–11 — The Temptation of Jesus. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Tote ho Iēsous anēchthē hypo tou Pneumatos eis tēn erēmon peirasthēnai hypo tou diabolou
After fasting forty days and forty nights, He was hungry.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai nēsteusas tesserakonta hēmeras kai tesserakonta nyktas hysteron epeinasen
The tempter came to Him and said, “If You are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai ho peirazōn proselthōn autō eipen Ei ei Huios tou Theou eipe hina houtoi hoi lithoi genōntai artoi
But Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.’”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Ho de apokritheis eipen Gegraptai ho anthrōpos Ouk zēsetai ep’ artō monō All’ epi panti rhēmati ekporeuomenō dia stomatos Theou
Then the devil took Him to the holy city and set Him on the pinnacle of the temple.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Tote ho diabolos paralambanei auton eis tēn hagian polin kai estēsen auton epi to pterygion tou hierou
“If You are the Son of God,” he said, “throw Yourself down. For it is written: ‘He will command His angels concerning You, and they will lift You up in their hands, so that You will not strike Your foot against a stone.’”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Ei ei Huios tou Theou kai legei autō bale seauton katō gar gegraptai enteleitai hoti Tois autou angelois peri sou kai se arousin epi cheirōn mē pote proskopsēs ton sou poda pros lithon
Jesus replied, “It is also written: ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Iēsous Ephē autō ho Palin gegraptai ekpeiraseis Ouk Kyrion ton sou Theon
Again, the devil took Him to a very high mountain and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Palin ho diabolos paralambanei auton eis lian hypsēlon oros kai deiknysin autō pasas tas basileias tou kosmou kai tēn autōn doxan
“All this I will give You,” he said, “if You will fall down and worship me.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
panta Tauta dōsō soi kai eipen autō ean pesōn proskynēsēs moi
“Away from Me, Satan!” Jesus told him. “For it is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God and serve Him only.’”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Hypage Satana Tote Iēsous legei autō ho gar gegraptai proskynēseis Kyrion ton sou theon kai latreuseis autō monō
Then the devil left Him, and angels came and ministered to Him.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Tote ho diabolos aphiēsin auton kai idou angeloi prosēlthon kai diēkonoun autō
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
⚙ Matthew's first verb about the tested Son is a passive: ἀνήχθη, He was led up. The initiative is not the devil's and not even, in the grammar, the Son's. JFB weighs the three accounts and finds the same fact under different pressure: Mark's word "driveth Him... putteth, or hurrieth Him forth," against "Matthew's more gentle expression, was led up," which "intimates how purely voluntary on His own part this action was." Pulpit draws the doctrinal line that keeps this from becoming blasphemy: "The Holy Spirit cannot, indeed, tempt, but he can and does lead us into circumstances where temptation is permitted." Benson keeps the one Greek verb from splitting in two: πειράζω "is to try," and the difference between God's trying and the devil's lies in the intention, not the word. Cambridge adds the geography of the demonic imagination: "The desert unpeopled by men was thought to be the abode of demons. So Jesus meets the evil spirit in his own domains." Then Matthew spends one verse on forty days and lands the whole weight on a single ingressive aorist, ἐπείνασεν, He came to hunger. Poole holds the two natures on that verb: the fast "showed he was God man, the Divine nature supported the human; afterward he was hungry, to show that he was truly man."
⚙ The accuser opens with the last word God spoke: Son of God (Matthew 3:17). The conditional is first-class, and Pulpit names it "the if of assumption": "The devil does not attempt to throw doubt on the truth of the utterance in Matthew 3:17." Gill allows the alternative, that it is "either doubting of his divine sonship, calling it in question," and we leave the two readings standing side by side. What is not in doubt is the answer's shape. Jesus replies with the perfect Γέγραπται, it stands written, and then quotes Deuteronomy 8:3 not as the Son but as ὁ ἄνθρωπος, man. Cambridge sets the two tests of sonship against each other in one sentence: obedience and trust on one side, "supply of bodily wants, external prosperity" on the other. Pulpit, with Trench, locates the force in the noun: "The creative word, the ῥῆμα Θεοῦ, which alone imparts to the bread its sustaining power, can sustain... apart from the bread." Barnes insists the Deuteronomy sense is plain and not mystical: God is not bound to bread. Benson states the method the Son will use three times over: "There is no better way of answering the tempter, than by opposing the word of God to his temptations."
⚙ Having felt the edge of the written word, the accuser picks it up. JFB quotes Bishop Hall's astonished line, "Satan himself with a Bible under his arm and a text in his mouth!" and explains the move: the tempter "was eager to try the effect of it from his own mouth." He quotes Psalm 91:11-12 in the Greek of the Psalter, and leaves out four words, to keep thee in all thy ways. Cambridge judges that "The omission distorts the meaning of the original." Benson, Henry and Poole agree; JFB and Pulpit think the sense survives intact, since Jesus answers the principle rather than the gap. Gill puts the fault precisely where it belongs: the passage was not even misapplied as to its subject, but was urged "to countenance actions which are out of the way of a man's calling." The answer is one word plus one text. Πάλιν, again, which Pulpit reads as aimed "not to our Lord's previous quotation... but to the devil's appeal to Scripture," citing Bengel: Scripture is interpreted and harmonised by Scripture. Then Deuteronomy 6:16, with its rare compound ἐκπειράσεις, you shall not put utterly to the proof. Ellicott supplies what the quotation leaves unsaid, that at Massah "the sin of the people had been that they questioned the presence of God with them until they saw a supernatural proof of it." The Son will not audit His Father.
⚙ The third approach drops the title "Son of God" and drops Scripture with it. JFB reads the silence as tell-tale: "No Scripture, it will be observed, is quoted now, because none could be found to support so blasphemous a claim... Despairing of success as an angel of light, he throws off all disguise." Ellicott names the change of target: "the temptation is no longer addressed to the sense of Sonship, but to the love of power." How much truth lies under the offer is disputed in the sources. Ellicott grants a partial claim (John 12:31; Ephesians 6:12), JFB grants it with the same texts plus Hebrews 2:14, Gill grants it nothing at all: "this poor, proud, wretched creature... has not the disposal, at his pleasure, of anyone single thing." Pulpit reads the demanded προσκυνήσῃς as "acknowledge my rights as over-lord" rather than "worship me as God." Benson takes the harder line, that the devil "claims, therefore, only a subordinate worship; and yet our Lord rejects his claim... on the ground of God only having a right to any kind of religious worship." The refusal is an imperative and a name: Ὕπαγε, Σατανᾶ. Matthew has withheld that name for ten verses. And the text He cites carries the same exclusive adjective that carried v. 4: μόνῳ, only. Bread alone will not do; God alone will be served.
⚙ Two verbs close the unit, and their tenses are the point. προσῆλθον is aorist, the angels came, one act; διηκόνουν is imperfect, they kept on ministering. Ellicott hears it: "The tenses of the two verbs differ, the latter implying continued or repeated ministrations." And the irony is exact. In v. 6 the angels were offered as a proof to be extracted from God by jumping; here they arrive unbidden. Ellicott states the principle: their help "comes as the reward of the abnegation which refused to make their ministry the subject of an experimental test." Poole draws it out for the reader at the low end of the same conflict: "as he did not flee from Christ till commanded away, so neither till commanded off by God doth he leave the people of God." Luke adds "for a season," and both Gill and Ellicott refuse to let the victory be read as final peace: the accuser returns, at Caesarea Philippi through Peter's mouth (Matthew 16:23, the same "Get thee behind me, Satan"), and at the end, in the hour and power of darkness.
⚙ Offered as the tool's own fallible reading, to be tested against the text. Three times the Son is invited to use something true. The baptismal voice is true; the psalm is true; the world's kingdoms really are, in some permitted sense, under the accuser's administration. Nothing offered here is a lie outright, which is why the temptation is dangerous and why Poole calls Scripture misapplied the most dangerous hook of all. What is refused each time is not a falsehood but a short way: bread without waiting, proof without trust, a kingdom without a cross. And the answers are all of one kind. He does not argue, does not display power, does not once invoke the title the enemy keeps pressing on Him. He stands on three sentences from a single book, two of them from the chapters a Jewish child learned first, and He answers as man. If that is right, then the deepest thing in this unit is not that Jesus was strong but that He was obedient, and that the obedience was exercised in the one place where Israel's had failed, the wilderness, on the same rations, with the same texts. The forty days answer the forty years. And the last word belongs to the Father, not the Son: the angels He would not summon come anyway, and stay. That is the pattern the whole Gospel will follow, all the way to a garden where twelve legions were available and not called.
Every offer was a shortcut around the Father's timing, and He answered all three with the same book. (⚙ synthesis, not Scripture.)
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The Verifier's strongest link out of this unit is lexical and unmistakable: πτερύγιον (G4419), the "little wing" of Matthew 4:5, occurs in only two verses of the Greek New Testament, here and at Luke 4:9. Cambridge notes the same rarity from the other side, that the word is "lit. 'a little wing,' an architectural term for a wing-like projection," and both Evangelists use the article, the winglet, as of a known feature. Pulpit observes that the aorist ἔστησεν here matches Luke's form exactly and is "probably a trace of the basis common to the two records." Luke's order of the second and third temptations differs from Matthew's, and the sources argue about which is original (JFB, Pulpit and Ellicott all defend Matthew; Godet and, by Pulpit's report, Ellicott elsewhere, favour Luke). The shared rare vocabulary does not settle the order; it does establish that the two accounts stand on one tradition.
Luke 4:9 · Luke 4:2
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G4419 πτερύγιον, which occurs in only 2 verses in the canon, plus G5207 υἱός and G2476 ἵστημι (Luke 4:9); Luke 4:2 shares G3985 πειράζω (34 vv) and G1228 διάβολος (35 vv). Greek to Greek, both New Testament, so a verbal tier can be scored.
The tempter's citation ends with a rare verb: προσκόψῃς (G4350, "to strike against, to stumble"), found in only eight verses, paired with λίθον (G3037). The Verifier finds the same rare pair at Romans 9:32 and 1 Peter 2:8, and there the terms have changed places: it is no longer a stone that might bruise the Messiah's foot but the Messiah who is the stone men stumble over. ⚙ Neither Paul nor Peter is quoting Matthew, and neither passage is quoting Psalm 91; the shared vocabulary is real, the inversion is ours to observe and not the commentators', so read it as a lexical observation that opens a motif, not as an argument either apostle makes. The verbal link itself is verifiable; the irony drawn from it is synthesis.
Romans 9:32 · 1 Peter 2:8 · Luke 4:11
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G4350 προσκόπτω (rare, in 8 vv) with G3037 λίθος (54 vv) at Romans 9:32, 1 Peter 2:8 and Luke 4:11, all New Testament, Greek to Greek. Deliberately NOT tiered verbal despite the rare lexeme: neither Paul nor Peter quotes this verse or Psalm 91 (both cite Isaiah 8:14), so the shared rare pair is a genuine lexical link inside a stone-and-stumbling motif, not a quotation relation. The theological inversion is marked ⚙ synthesis in the body.
ἐκπειράζω (G1598), the intensified compound Jesus uses in v. 7, is not the ordinary πειράζω of vv. 1 and 3. It appears in only four verses of the Greek canon. Two of them are the Lukan parallel to this very answer (Luke 4:12) and the lawyer who stood up "testing" Jesus at Luke 10:25, where the same compound describes a man putting the Son of God on trial. ⚙ The unit therefore contains both halves of the verb's canonical range: the command not to test God, and the practice of testing Him. Gill notes on v. 7 that in Hebrew usage the corresponding verb "is always taken in an ill part... of such who would try the power, goodness, or will of God."
Luke 4:12 · Luke 10:25
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G1598 ἐκπειράζω, rare at 4 verses in the canon (Luke 4:12 also shares G611 ἀποκρίνομαι, Luke 10:25 also G2400 ἰδού). New Testament to New Testament.
Every one of the Son's replies comes from Deuteronomy, and from a narrow band of it: 8:3, then 6:16, then 6:13. Ellicott notes what that band was in Jewish practice: Deuteronomy 6:4-9 supplied "one of the passages... for the phylacteries or frontlets worn by devout Jews," so "The words which our Lord now uses had, we must believe, been familiar to Him from His childhood." Pulpit says the same of the Shema portions being "the first part of Scripture taught a Jewish child." Cambridge sets the chapter's own frame over the scene: Deuteronomy 8 "sets forth the teaching of the wilderness. The forty years were to the Jews what the forty days are to Jesus." The quotations are explicit and verbatim from the Septuagint (Pulpit checks each one, noting that at 6:13 the LXX has προσκυνήσεις where the Hebrew has "fear," and adds "only"). But the tier cannot be verbal: a Greek to Hebrew pairing shares no Strong's lexicon, so the Verifier cannot score a shared lexeme across the Testaments. The citation is certain; the badge is honest about what can be computed.
Deuteronomy 8:3 · Deuteronomy 6:16 · Deuteronomy 6:13
basis: Explicit, verbatim citation of the Septuagint of Deuteronomy 8:3; 6:16; 6:13, recorded by Ellicott, Barnes, JFB, Poole, Gill, Cambridge and Pulpit alike. Cross-Testament (Greek New Testament to Hebrew Old Testament), so no shared Strong's lexeme can be computed and no verbal tier may be scored, despite the quotation being explicit.
Matthew 4:6 reproduces Psalm 91:11-12 in the Septuagint's own wording, minus the clause to keep thee in all thy ways. JFB confirms the textual state: "The quotation is, precisely as it stands in the Hebrew and the Septuagint, save that after the first clause the words, 'to keep thee in all thy ways,' are here omitted." Luke, as Pulpit notes, omits only "in all thy ways." What the omission means is genuinely contested in the sources. Cambridge: "The omission distorts the meaning of the original." Benson, Poole and Henry concur, Henry flatly: "Satan misquoted the words." JFB and Pulpit dissent, JFB holding "the sense of it is precisely the same whether the clause in question be inserted or not," and Pulpit judging Trench's reading "strained." Cambridge adds that "The Psalmist himself probably quotes Proverbs 3:23." As with the Deuteronomy answers, this is a Greek New Testament text citing a Hebrew psalm, so no verbal tier is available here.
Psalm 91:11-12 · Proverbs 3:23
basis: Explicit citation of Psalm 91:11-12 (LXX wording, one clause omitted), attested as such by JFB, Cambridge, Benson, Poole, Henry and Pulpit. The Proverbs 3:23 link is Cambridge's own suggestion about the Psalmist's source, not a claim of this unit. Cross-Testament, so shared Strong's lexemes cannot be computed and the verbal tier is unavailable.
The shape of the unit tracks Israel's wilderness generation, and the sources say so before we do. Cambridge reads Jesus tempted "As the Son of Abraham following the fortunes of his race, tempted in the wilderness as the Hebrews were tempted. A thought present implicitly in our Lord's answers." JFB develops the whole first reply as an argument from Israel's case: "if Israel spent, not forty days, but forty years in a waste, howling wilderness... on purpose to prove to every age that human support depends not upon bread, but upon God's unfailing word." The three texts quoted all come from Moses' rehearsal of that very failure, and the sin named at Deuteronomy 6:16 is Massah, where the people demanded proof (Exodus 17:1-7). ⚙ Where Israel murmured for bread, demanded a sign, and turned to a golden calf, the Son answers hunger, height and empire from the book that records those three failures. That reading is figural and ancient, but the badge stays typological rather than verbal because it is a pattern claim across two lexicons.
Deuteronomy 8:2 · Exodus 17:1-7 · Exodus 32:4
basis: Ancient and widely held: Cambridge names Jesus as "the Son of Abraham following the fortunes of his race," JFB argues the first answer from Israel's forty years, Pulpit cites Exodus 32:4 at v. 9. Figural correspondence between Israel's forty years and the Son's forty days, not a verbal link; cross-Testament, so no shared lexeme is computable.
1 Corinthians 10:9 warns the church not to do the thing Deuteronomy 6:16 forbade and Matthew 4:7 quotes, and it sets the warning in the wilderness narrative Paul has been rehearsing since 10:1. The Verifier records the shared Greek root G3985 πειράζω between that verse and this unit. ⚙ The lexeme is not rare (34 verses), and Paul does not quote Matthew, so the link is a shared root inside a shared wilderness motif rather than a citation. We tier it structural on that basis and claim nothing more: it shows that the apostolic church read Israel's testing in the desert as the standing warning it also is in this unit.
1 Corinthians 10:9
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G3985 πειράζω (34 vv, not rare) with G5259 ὑπό (200 vv). Both New Testament, so a verbal tier is technically permitted, but the lexeme is too common to carry one; downgraded to structural, with the shared wilderness-testing motif as the real basis.
The title Matthew uses four times in this unit, διάβολος (G1228, in 35 verses), reappears at Revelation 12:9 ("that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan") and Revelation 2:10, where the same accuser "is about to throw some of you into prison, that you may be tested" (G3985 πειράζω, with a span of days). Barnes gathers the canonical names at v. 1: Satan (Job 1:6-12), Beelzebub, the old Serpent (Revelation 12:9), the Prince of the power of the air. ⚙ The shared vocabulary is real but common; what it shows is that the tester of the Son and the tester of His churches are named with the same two words, and that the second is measured in days as the first was.
Revelation 12:9 · Revelation 2:10
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G1228 διάβολος (35 vv) and, at Revelation 2:10, G3985 πειράζω (34 vv) and G2250 ἡμέρα (368 vv). New Testament to New Testament, but no rare lexeme, so the tier stays structural rather than verbal.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
Barnes states the reading plainly at v. 1: "When the first Adam was created he was subjected to the temptation of the devil, and he fell and involved the race in ruin: it was not improper that the second Adam, the Redeemer of the race, should be subjected to temptation, in order that it might be seen that there was no power that could alienate him from God." Cambridge lists it second among four: Jesus tempted "As the second Adam regaining for man what the first Adam lost for man." Gill notes at v. 3 that the tempter "might hope the rather to succeed in this temptation... because he had carried his point with our first parents, by tempting them to eat of the forbidden fruit." ⚙ The differences are as instructive as the parallel, and Ellicott flags one himself while arguing against a mythical origin for the narrative: had the story been built out of Genesis 3, "we should have expected the recurrence of the same symbolism, of the serpent and the trees." A garden with every tree, and a man who ate; a desert with no bread, and a man who would not.
Genesis 3:1-6 · Romans 5:19 · 1 Corinthians 15:45
Every answer comes from Moses' account of the wilderness generation, and the commentators read that as deliberate. Cambridge: tempted "As the Son of Abraham following the fortunes of his race, tempted in the wilderness as the Hebrews were tempted. A thought present implicitly in our Lord's answers." JFB expands the first reply into exactly that argument from Israel's forty years, and Pulpit, citing Wisdom 16:26 as a Jewish reading of the manna, shows how the Deuteronomy text was already understood as teaching dependence rather than diet. ⚙ Where the nation demanded bread, demanded a sign at Massah, and made a visible god at Sinai, the Son declines all three in the same order and from the same book. The Gospel then moves at once to Galilee and the announcement of a kingdom (Matthew 4:17) that the tempter had just offered to hand over without a cross.
Deuteronomy 8:2-3 · Exodus 17:7 · Hosea 11:1 · Matthew 2:15
Benson lists five reasons for the temptation and gives the fourth apostolic warrant: "That Christ might become a merciful and faithful high priest, one who can succour his people in time of need... The apostle assigns this reason expressly, Hebrews 2:17-18." Poole reaches the same text from the hunger of v. 2: He was hungry "to show that he was truly man, touched with the feeling of our infirmities, in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin, Hebrews 4:15." Gill says the leading into the wilderness was "that he might have a heart as man, as well as power, as God, to succour them that are tempted." Henry turns it toward the tempted reader: "It is a comfort to us that Christ suffered, being tempted; for thus it appears that our temptations, if not yielded to, are not sins, they are afflictions only." ⚙ This is the unit's pastoral center, and it is not our invention: four independent commentators reach Hebrews from four different verses.
Hebrews 2:17-18 · Hebrews 4:15 · Hebrews 5:8
Cambridge reads the desert setting as an invasion: "The desert unpeopled by men was thought to be the abode of demons. So Jesus meets the evil spirit in his own domains, the Stronger One coming upon the strong man who keepeth his palace (Luke 11:21-22)." JFB lists among the purposes of the conflict that Christ should be encouraged "to go forward spoiling principalities and powers, until at length He should make a show of them openly, triumphing over them in His cross," and Gill that the enemy might "expect, in a short time, the ruin of his kingdom by him." ⚙ The offer of the kingdoms is answered not by a counter-argument about ownership but by a dismissal and a text, and Matthew's own Gospel closes the circle on a mountain where all authority in heaven and on earth is given, not traded for. Pulpit makes that connection at v. 10 explicitly. The tier of this reading is figural, the attestation ancient.
Luke 11:21-22 · Colossians 2:15 · Hebrews 2:14 · Matthew 28:18
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text. Scripture is the Berean Standard Bible; the Greek surface forms, transliterations, Strong's numbers and parses are the Berean interlinear as supplied in the brief. Commentary excerpts are verbatim public-domain text from the named authors, resolved from anchors rather than retyped.
What is genuinely uncertain in this unit. (1) How the narrative reached Matthew. Ellicott lays out the options at length and argues it must trace to Jesus' own account, since "It could not have come, directly or indirectly, from an eye-witness"; Cambridge says the same more briefly. That is an inference, not a datum. (2) Whether the transports were bodily, visionary or parabolic. Gill argues for real bodily transport; Barnes denies it on lexical grounds; Ellicott suspends judgment with 2 Corinthians 12:2; Pulpit holds that a purely mental removal would make the temptation unreal. We record the disagreement and take no side. (3) The location of the mountain and the identity of the pinnacle. Unknown. Cambridge: "It is idle to ask what this mountain was." Barnes, JFB, Gill and Pulpit each nominate different candidates for the πτερύγιον. (4) The order of the temptations. Matthew and Luke differ; JFB, Pulpit and Ellicott (as reported at v. 5) argue for Matthew's order from the "Get thee hence" at v. 10; Godet and, per Pulpit, Ellicott elsewhere, prefer Luke's. (5) Whether the omitted clause of Psalm 91:11 changes the sense. Cambridge, Benson, Poole and Henry say yes; JFB and Pulpit say no. (6) The scope of "all the kingdoms of the world." Barnes limits it to Palestine and its neighbours; Gill insists on the whole earth.
What is not uncertain. The three citations are Deuteronomy 8:3, 6:16 and 6:13, and the tempter's is Psalm 91:11-12. Every commentator in the brief names them identically.
On the badges. Threads touching Deuteronomy and the Psalms are tiered structural or typological, never verbal, even though the quotations are explicit and verbatim: a Greek New Testament verse and a Hebrew Old Testament verse share no Strong's lexicon, so no shared lexeme can be computed and no verbal claim can be scored. Verbal tiers here are reserved for Greek to Greek links carrying a rare lexeme (πτερύγιον in 2 verses, ἐκπειράζω in 4, προσκόπτω in 8). The 1 Corinthians 10:9 and Revelation links are New Testament to New Testament but rest on common lexemes, so they were deliberately downgraded to structural.
Marked as machine synthesis. Every ⚙ paragraph, the sola reading and the pullquote are this tool's own fallible work, offered to be tested. Where a ⚙ observation extends a sourced fact (the προσκόπτω inversion in thread two, the Israel-failure sequence in the typological thread), the body says so in place.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)