When Jesus saw the crowds, He went up on the mountain and sat down. His disciples came to Him,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de Idōn tous ochlous anebē eis to oros kai autou kathisantos hoi autou mathētai prosēlthan autō
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Sermon on the Mount
Matthew 5:1–2 — The Sermon on the Mount. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
When Jesus saw the crowds, He went up on the mountain and sat down. His disciples came to Him,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de Idōn tous ochlous anebē eis to oros kai autou kathisantos hoi autou mathētai prosēlthan autō
and He began to teach them, saying:
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai anoixas to autou stoma edidasken autous legōn
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
The sermon opens on a participle, not a command: Ἰδὼν (aorist, having seen), with the crowds in the accusative plural and the article pointing back, as JFB and Pulpit both say, to the multitudes of Matthew 4:25. Benson reads the seeing as compassion, that the Son of God beheld a vast multitude bewildered in the darkness of ignorance and felt a strong desire to give them more particular instruction. The grammar at least supports his logic, since the seeing is subordinated to ἀνέβη (G305, aorist, he went up): sight first, then ascent. Where he went up is the unit's one genuinely contested fact. Cambridge insists on the article, the mountain, the high land behind Tell Hum, and calls it the Sinai of the New Law. Pulpit, citing Thayer, takes the same article to mean nothing more than the mountain nearest by. Barnes reports the traditional site, the Horns of Hattin, quotes Professor Hackett's eyewitness description of it at length, and then says of the claim that he cannot say he has any great confidence in it. ⚙ Three named voices, one article, no name in the text: the honest reading is that Matthew gives a definite mountain and withholds its identity.
καθίσαντος αὐτοῦ is a genitive absolute, a backgrounded circumstance, so the finite verb of the clause is not the sitting but προσῆλθαν (G4334, they came toward). Yet the backgrounded detail is the loaded one. Gill says the sitting was not for rest but in order to teach, since sitting was the posture of masters, and he supplies the rabbinic staging from Maimonides: the master at the head, the disciples before him in a circuit like a crown, so that all see the master and hear his words. Cambridge adds that in the Talmud to sit is nearly synonymous with to teach; Poole says he sat after the manner of the Jewish doctors to show their authority; Barnes lists the same posture at Luke 4:20, John 8:2 and Acts 13:14. ⚙ Authority is therefore claimed by body before it is claimed by speech. Then the disciples draw near, and the voices split on who they are: Barnes holds the word to its lexical floor, learners, and refuses to read all of them as Christians; Pulpit takes it of all personal followers who attached themselves to learn, at least until John 6:66; Cambridge calls the approach the beginning of the Christian Church.
BSB gives "and He began to teach them", and the interlinear shows the cost: τὸ στόμα αὐτοῦ is carried by no English word at all. The formula matters. JFB calls it a solemn way of arousing the reader's attention and preparing him for something weighty, citing Job and Acts 8:35 and 10:34; Pulpit calls it a Hebraism indicating set will and purpose, and notes that in the Gospels in this sense it occurs only here and at Matthew 13:35, which quotes Psalm 78:2 in Greek; Gill hears in it a clear and strong voice, that all the people might hear him. The main verb is then imperfect, ἐδίδασκεν, he was teaching, with the present participle λέγων running on into the Beatitudes without a break. ⚙ Matthew has built a hinge that refuses to close: the tense leaves the teaching open, the participle leaves the sentence unfinished, and chapters 5 to 7 are what completes both. On the object of the teaching, Gill says the whole multitude, Pulpit says primarily those who had already made some advance toward him with the multitudes standing by, and Geneva simply anticipates the answer of verse 3.
⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested. Two verses of pure staging carry more theology than they seem to. Matthew records four things and nothing else: a seeing, an ascent, a seating, and an approach. Each is a posture of office. The seeing is the shepherd's, and it precedes the climb rather than following it, so the mountain is a response to the crowds and not an escape from them. The ascent is upward and deliberate, and the Greek gives a definite mountain with no name, which is exactly what the named voices cannot agree about: Cambridge hears Sinai in the article, Pulpit hears only the nearest high ground, Barnes distrusts the traditional site outright. Under Sola Scriptura the text does not adjudicate that, and neither will we. The seating is the one detail every voice in the brief agrees on, and it is the sharpest: Gill's Maimonides, Cambridge's Talmudic note, Poole's Jewish doctors all say the same thing, that a seated teacher is a teacher claiming authority. Then the opening of the mouth, a formula that Pulpit shows Matthew uses only twice, here and at 13:35. So before a single beatitude is spoken, Matthew has told us how to hear what follows: as law from a height, delivered by someone seated in the chair of the master, in his own name, with no "thus says the LORD" anywhere in it. The line set apart below is this tool's sentence, machine synthesis, not a verse of Scripture.
He does not descend in fire this time; He climbs, He sits, and He opens His mouth.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The pair ἀνέβη εἰς τὸ ὄρος (G305 + G3735) recurs across the Gospels at every hinge: Jesus goes up the mountain alone to pray (Matthew 14:23), goes up and sits there to heal the crowds (Matthew 15:29), goes up to call the Twelve (Mark 3:13), goes up to pray and is transfigured (Luke 9:28). ⚙ The lexemes are common (oros in 63 verses, anabainō in 78), so this is a recurring pattern of scene-setting rather than a quotation chain; Matthew 15:29 is the closest, since there alone the ascent is followed by the same seating verb.
Matthew 14:23 · Matthew 15:29 · Mark 3:13 · Luke 9:28
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G3735 ὄρος (in 63 vv) and G305 ἀναβαίνω (in 78 vv) at all four refs. Neither lexeme is rare, and there is no citation, so the link is a shared pattern of ascent, not a verbal quotation.
καθίζω (G2523) and διδάσκω (G1321) travel together: Jesus sits in the boat and teaches the crowds (Luke 5:3), sits in the temple at dawn and teaches (John 8:2), and Paul sits a year and six months teaching the word at Corinth (Acts 18:11). Barnes lists this as the common mode of teaching among the Jews; Cambridge notes that in the Talmud to sit is nearly synonymous with to teach; Gill quotes Maimonides on the master seated at the head with the disciples about him. ⚙ The verbal collocation is real and repeated, but kathizō appears in 45 verses and didaskō in 91, so the tier stays structural.
Luke 5:3 · John 8:2 · Acts 18:11
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G2523 καθίζω (in 45 vv) with G1321 διδάσκω (in 91 vv) at Luke 5:3, John 8:2 and Acts 18:11; Luke 5:3 also shares G3793 ὄχλος (in 170 vv). A repeated idiom of posture, not a quotation.
ἀνοίξας τὸ στόμα (G455 + G4750) is a set phrase for speech that is willed rather than casual. Philip opens his mouth and preaches Jesus from Isaiah (Acts 8:35), where the same pairing has just been used of the lamb that in his humiliation did not open his mouth (Acts 8:32). Revelation turns it the other way: the beast opens his mouth in blasphemies against God (Revelation 13:6). ⚙ The same formula therefore marks both the evangelist's commission and the blasphemer's defiance; what it always marks is intent. Pulpit assembles this list independently and adds Matthew 13:35, Acts 10:34, Acts 18:14.
Acts 8:32 · Acts 8:35 · Revelation 13:6
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G455 ἀνοίγω (in 75 vv) and G4750 στόμα (in 71 vv) at all three refs. Frequencies are moderate and there is no citation formula, so this is a shared idiom, not a verbal quotation; Pulpit names the same set of parallels.
The finite verb of Matthew 5:1 is the disciples' approach, προσῆλθαν (G4334). Matthew uses the same three words together only once more, when the disciples come to him as he sits on the Mount of Olives to ask about the end (Matthew 24:3): mountain, disciples, coming near, the opening of the first great discourse and of the last. Hebrews then takes the same approach verb and the same noun for mountain and says of the church that you have come to Mount Zion (Hebrews 12:22), the mountain that is not touched with fire. ⚙ Cambridge's remark that this approach may be regarded as the beginning of the Christian Church reads Matthew 5:1 in exactly that direction, though Cambridge does not cite Hebrews.
Matthew 24:3 · Hebrews 12:22
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G3735 ὄρος (in 63 vv) and G4334 προσέρχομαι (in 85 vv) at both refs, plus G3101 μαθητής (in 247 vv) at Matthew 24:3. All refs are New Testament, but the lexemes are common and no citation is claimed, so the tier stays structural rather than verbal.
Cambridge states it flatly on this verse: it was the Sinai of the New Law. The figure is old and widely held, and the correspondences are plain enough (a mountain, a lawgiver, a people below, words given from a height). ⚙ But the text of Matthew 5:1 makes no such claim, and the Verifier supplies no shared lexeme, because it cannot: the link crosses from Greek into Hebrew. Note also where the figure breaks. At Sinai the people are fenced off from the mountain and Moses goes up to receive; here the disciples come up to the teacher, and he is the one who speaks. We record this as a figural reading, not as a verbal or quoted connection.
Exodus 19:20 · Exodus 24:12
basis: Figural reading, ancient and widely held, named here from Cambridge on Matthew 5:1. Cross-Testament: a verbal tier cannot be scored because the shared Strong's evidence does not cross the Greek and Hebrew lexicons, and no Verifier candidate links these refs. Matthew makes no citation of Exodus at this verse.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
Benson says it directly on this verse: he taught them as the great prophet and lawgiver of his church. ⚙ The claim is not made by a title in the text but by the staging, and the staging is dense. He goes up to a height, he takes the seat of the master, and when he opens his mouth what follows is not delivered as oracle but as teaching, ἐδίδασκεν, with no messenger formula anywhere in the sermon. A prophet says that the LORD has spoken; Matthew has his teacher seated, speaking, and by Matthew 7:28 the crowds are astonished precisely because he taught as one having authority. Cambridge names the same thing typologically, the Sinai of the New Law, and Geneva reads the whole discourse that follows as Christ's own teaching about where happiness is laid up. The redemptive-historical reading is widely held and rests on what the text shows rather than on what it asserts.
Matthew 7:28-29 · Exodus 24:12
Pulpit records that in the Gospels, in this sense, the only other place the phrase ἀνοίξας τὸ στόμα stands is Matthew 13:35, and that Matthew 13:35 is a quotation of Psalm 78:2 in its Greek form, applied to Jesus as the one who will open his mouth in parables and utter things hidden from the foundation of the world. ⚙ That is Matthew's own evangelistic judgment, not ours: the same evangelist who applies the psalm's opened mouth to Jesus in chapter 13 has already used the formula in chapter 5. So the opening of the mouth here is not a stylistic flourish but a marker of the speech of the one through whom hidden things are uttered. JFB independently reads the phrase as preparing the reader for something weighty.
Matthew 13:35 · Psalm 78:2
⚙ The first thing recorded of the preacher is not a word but a look: Ἰδὼν, and Strong's widens the root beyond eyesight to attending to. Benson reads compassion into it, that the Son of God beheld the multitude lost in sin and wretchedness and had compassion on them. Matthew uses that pastoral logic explicitly elsewhere, at 9:36, where seeing the crowds moves him because they were harassed and helpless. ⚙ Read that way, the Sermon on the Mount is itself an act of mercy toward a shepherdless crowd before it is an ethical standard, which is a fallible reading of a participle and is offered as such. Henry puts the same order in different words, that none will find happiness who do not seek it from Christ by the rule of his word.
Matthew 9:36
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text: BSB (CC0) with the Berean interlinear and Strong's numbers; the brief supplies no textual variants for either verse, so none are claimed here. Two places where the English departs from the Greek word count should be stated plainly: BSB supplies the name "Jesus" at 5:1, where the Greek has only the aorist participle Ἰδὼν, and at 5:2 BSB renders ἀνοίξας τὸ στόμα αὐτοῦ as "He began", leaving three Greek words without an English gloss in the interlinear. Both are defensible translation choices, and both hide something.
Genuinely uncertain: the site. Cambridge, Pulpit and Barnes are quoted here in open disagreement about what τὸ ὄρος refers to, and Barnes and Pulpit both discount the traditional Karn Hattin identification, Pulpit noting that the tradition dates only from the time of the Crusades. Also disputed, and left undecided in this unit: whether this discourse is the same as Luke 6:20-49. Ellicott judges the two discourses quite distinct; JFB surveys the critics and likewise leans to two separate discourses while noting that many able critics hold the opposite, and that Alford leaves the question undecided. Barnes allows that the substance may have been repeated on different occasions. We record the disagreement rather than resolving it.
Thread tiers here are deliberately conservative. Every Greek to Greek candidate in this unit rests on lexemes of moderate frequency (oros 63 verses, anabainō 78, kathizō 45, anoigō 75, stoma 71, didaskō 91), so none is tiered verbal; the Sinai link is figural and cross-Testament, so it is tiered typological and cannot be scored on shared Strong's numbers at all. The third christ reading, on the seeing that precedes the sermon, is marked novel: Benson supplies the compassion, but connecting this participle to Matthew 9:36 is this tool's own move and should be tested.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)