“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Makarioi hoi ptōchoi tō pneumati Hoti autōn estin hē basileia tōn ouranōn
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Beatitudes
Matthew 5:3–12 — The Beatitudes. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Makarioi hoi ptōchoi tō pneumati Hoti autōn estin hē basileia tōn ouranōn
Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Makarioi hoi penthountes Hoti autoi paraklēthēsontai
Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Makarioi hoi praeis Hoti autoi klēronomēsousin tēn gēn
Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filled.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Makarioi hoi peinōntes kai dipsōntes tēn dikaiosynēn Hoti autoi chortasthēsontai
Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Makarioi hoi eleēmones Hoti autoi eleēthēsontai
Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Makarioi hoi katharoi tē kardia Hoti autoi opsontai ton Theon
Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Makarioi hoi eirēnopoioi Hoti autoi klēthēsontai huioi Theou
Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Makarioi hoi dediōgmenoi heneken dikaiosynēs Hoti autōn estin hē basileia tōn ouranōn
Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you, and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of Me.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Makarioi este hotan oneidisōsin hymas kai diōxōsin kai pseudomenoi eipōsin pan ponēron kath’ hymōn heneken emou
Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets before you.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
chairete kai agalliasthe hoti polys ho hymōn misthos en tois ouranois gar houtōs ediōxan tous prophētas tous pro hymōn
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
⚙ Before any doctrine is argued, look at what the Greek does not say. Eight times the line opens Μακάριοι with no copula under it: the interlinear has to bracket “[are]” every time. Pulpit names what the adjective is doing: it describes the poor in spirit “as possessors of ‘happiness’ ... in reference to their inherent state, not to the gifts or the rewards that they receive,” and marks that it is makarioi and not eulogēmenoi, the word for those upon whom a blessing is pronounced. Benson draws the pastoral consequence: our Lord “seems, as it were, to lay aside his supreme authority as our legislator ... he, in a more gentle and engaging way, insinuates his will and our duty by pronouncing those happy who comply with it.” The first ten verses of the Sermon on the Mount contain no imperative at all. The first command in the unit is chairete, and it does not arrive until v. 12.
⚙ The parse data carries an argument the English cannot. Of the eight promises, six stand in the future indicative: paraklēthēsontai, klēronomēsousin, chortasthēsontai, eleēthēsontai, opsontai, klēthēsontai. Two stand in the present: autōn estin hē basileia, at v. 3 and again at v. 10. JFB, working without the parse table, reached the same shape from the sense: the kingdom “has two stages, a present and a future, an initial and a consummate stage, so the fulfilment of each of these promises has two stages.” Note further that four of the six futures are passive with no agent stated (comforted, filled, shown mercy, called), one is middle (they shall see), and only one is active (they shall inherit). ⚙ Our reading: the grammar itself refuses to let these people be the doers of their own blessedness, except in the two places where the text hands them heirship and sight.
JFB's structural observation is the sharpest in the brief and belongs to him: “though eight in number, there are here but seven distinct features of character. The eighth one, the ‘persecuted for righteousness' sake,’ denotes merely the possessors of the seven preceding features, on account of which it is that they are persecuted.” This is why v. 10 has no new promise and simply repeats v. 3. Cambridge reads the same eight as a ladder instead: “Mark the Christian growth step by step. First, spiritual poverty ... Secondly, sadness for sin. Thirdly, meekness ... Fourthly, the soul-hunger for righteousness. Then three virtues of the Christian life ... mercy, purity, peacemaking.” JFB then answers the obvious objection, how such features could provoke violence, feature by feature: “Poverty of spirit runs counter to the pride of men's heart ... purity of heart contrasts painfully with painted hypocrisy; and the peacemaker cannot easily be endured by the contentious, quarrelsome world.”
⚙ Two things change at once in v. 11, and they change in the same grammatical slots. The copula appears (Makarioi este, present indicative, 2nd person plural), and the cause of suffering, which was heneken dikaiosynēs in v. 10, becomes heneken emou in v. 11. Ellicott sees the first: “Here, for the first time, the beatitude is uttered, not as a general law, but as the portion of the listening disciples to whom the Teacher spoke.” JFB sees the second and will not soften it: “He identifies Himself and His cause with that of righteousness ... Would Moses, or David, or Isaiah, or Paul have so expressed themselves? Never.” Pulpit, reading the same line, concludes that the “Messianic consciousness” is already fully developed at this early stage of the ministry. Then the hunting verb diōkō, which stood as a perfect participle in v. 10 and an aorist subjunctive in v. 11, lands in v. 12 as a plain aorist indictment of history: houtōs ediōxan tous prophētas. Poole names the hunted: “Elijah, Micaiah, Jeremiah, Amos, and the rest of the prophets, whom you succeed, not in time only, but in the same office of revealing the mind of God to the people.”
⚙ Fallible, offered to be tested. Read from the Greek up rather than from the doctrine down, these ten verses are not eight entrance requirements but one portrait drawn in verb tenses. Every entry describes a lack (beggary, grief, refusal to seize, starvation) or a costly outward act (mercy, purity, peacemaking) that the world reliably punishes, which is why JFB can collapse the eighth into the other seven. To every lack the text answers with a passive future and an unnamed agent: they will be comforted, filled, shown mercy, called. To the two furthest ends of the list, the beggars and the hunted, it answers instead with a present indicative: the kingdom is theirs, now, in the same tense in which they are poor. ⚙ We take that to be the point of the grammar: the one possession the Beatitudes hand over in the present is given to the people who have nothing and to the people who have lost what they had, and the promise is not payment for the losing. That the verbs are hedged all through with what the voices say, some are saints already found, JFB says, some are still conscious only of their need, is a fair caution against reading this as a ladder anyone climbs. Where we would gently press past the brief's voices: Benson, Poole and Ellicott all rush to insist that misthos in v. 12 is “not of debt, but of grace,” which is sound theology and is not in the word. The Greek says wage. We think the text leaves the wage-word standing on purpose, and that Pulpit is nearer the truth in reading it as real moral correspondence rather than as a contract quietly denied. The line set beside this reading below is our own sentence, not a verse of Scripture.
The only present tense in all eight is the one attached to people who have nothing left.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The adjective at Matthew 5:7, ἐλεήμονες (eleēmōn, G1655), is not a common word. The Verifier finds it standing in only two verses of the New Testament: this one, and Hebrews 2:17, where the incarnate Son is made like his brothers “that He might become a merciful and faithful high priest.” ⚙ The beatitude therefore pronounces blessed exactly the quality that one other New Testament verse predicates of Christ himself, using the identical rare lexeme. JFB, without the concordance data, argues the same direction theologically: “our Lord Himself expressly teaches us that God's method is to awaken in us compassion towards our fellow men by His own exercise of it.” The Greek supplies the link JFB is reasoning toward.
Hebrews 2:17
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G1655 ἐλεήμων, found in only 2 verses of the New Testament (score 0.50). Greek to Greek, New Testament only. A rare shared lexeme, not a quotation: Hebrews does not cite Matthew here.
πραεῖς (praus, G4239) at Matthew 5:5 stands in only four verses of the New Testament, and the Verifier returns three of them as candidates. At Matthew 11:29 Jesus says “I am meek and lowly in heart,” sharing both praus and καρδία (G2588) with this unit; at Matthew 21:5 Matthew applies the same adjective to the king entering Jerusalem; at 1 Peter 3:4 it names “a meek and quiet spirit,” sharing praus, kardia and pneuma with Matthew 5:3-8. Cambridge notices the first link at this verse: meekness is “a characteristic of Jesus Himself, who says ‘I am meek and lowly in heart.’” JFB gathers the same three passages. ⚙ The lexical evidence is unusually clean here: a four-verse word, used of the blessed, of the Lord's own temper, and of the king on the colt.
Matthew 11:29 · Matthew 21:5 · 1 Peter 3:4
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G4239 πραΰς, found in only 4 verses (Matthew 11:29 score 0.26 with G2588 καρδία; Matthew 21:5 score 0.25; 1 Peter 3:4 score 0.26 with G4151 πνεῦμα and G2588 καρδία). Greek to Greek, New Testament only. Rare shared vocabulary, not quotation.
Pulpit traces the phrase directly: “since in the eleventh verse of the psalm it is directly said of the meek: ‘But the meek shall inherit the land (LXX., οἱ δὲ πραεῖς κληρονομήσουσιν γῆν),’ it is, doubtless, from this latter passage that our Lord borrows the phrase.” JFB says flatly that the promise “is but a repetition of Ps 37:11.” Cambridge, Gill, Barnes and Poole all cite the same psalm at this verse. ⚙ The allusion is as close as an allusion gets, and the LXX line Pulpit quotes differs from Matthew only in the article. But the badge cannot be scored “verbal”: Matthew's lexeme is Greek G4239 and the psalm's is Hebrew, and shared Strong's numbers do not cross between the two lexicons. We tier it structural and say why, rather than claim a verbal identity our own method cannot verify.
Psalm 37:11
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so no shared Strong's lexeme can be computed and no verbal tier can be scored. Basis is the named testimony of Pulpit (who quotes the LXX of Psalm 37:11 as οἱ δὲ πραεῖς κληρονομήσουσιν γῆν), JFB, Cambridge, Barnes, Poole and Gill, all citing Psalm 37 at this verse. The allusion is real; the tier is held down by the method, not by doubt.
Pulpit: “Observe that vers. 3, 4 (οἱ πτωχοί οἱ πενθοῦντες, possibly also ver. 5, vide infra) recall Isaiah 61:1, 2. As recently in the synagogue at Nazareth (Luke 4:18, 19), so also here, he bases the explanation of his work on the prophecy of that work in the Book of Isaiah.” Gill, at v. 4, says the same more briefly: “Isaiah 61:1 seems to be referred to, both in this, and in the preceding verse.” JFB calls this class “mourners in Zion” after the same oracle, and Barnes cites Isaiah 61:1-3 for the comfort. ⚙ The reading is figural as well as verbal: the good news to the poor and the comfort of mourners are not merely echoed but claimed, by a speaker who had already read that scroll aloud and sat down. We mark it typological rather than verbal because the tiers cannot be scored across the Greek and Hebrew lexicons.
Isaiah 61:1-2 · Luke 4:18
basis: Cross-Testament allusion, so no shared Strong's lexeme is computable and no verbal tier is possible. Basis is the named testimony of Pulpit, Gill, JFB and Barnes, each citing Isaiah 61:1-3 at Matthew 5:3-4, together with Luke 4:18-19. Attestation: ancient and widely held.
The Verifier returns Luke 6:20, 6:21 and 6:22 as the three strongest same-language candidates, sharing makarios (G3107), and at 6:20 also basileia (G932) and ptōchos (G4434). Pulpit, quoting Ellicott's Historical Lectures, judges that “there is little doubt that the two accounts (here and Luke 6) represent one and the same discourse.” The commentators use the parallel to settle the very question v. 3 raises: Barnes notes “Luke says simply, Blessed are the poor”; Cambridge concludes that “St Luke omits ‘in spirit,’ showing that the literal poor are primarily meant, St Matthew shows that they are not exclusively meant.” ⚙ The shared lexemes here are common ones, so the link is recorded as structural rather than verbal even though both texts are Greek.
Luke 6:20 · Luke 6:21 · Luke 6:22
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G3107 μακάριος (in 49 vv), with G932 βασιλεία (in 154 vv) and G4434 πτωχός (in 34 vv) at Luke 6:20 (scores 0.23, 0.29, 0.41). All three lexemes are common, so no rare-word verbal tier is earned; the link is the parallel discourse itself, as Pulpit argues from Ellicott.
The Verifier returns 1 Peter 3:14 (“if ye suffer for righteousness' sake, blessed are ye”) and 1 Peter 4:14 among the candidates, sharing makarios, and at 4:14 also pneuma. Pulpit thinks the dependence runs one way: on v. 10, “St Peter also says, perhaps with a reference to our Lord's words, that they who suffer διὰ δικαιοσύνην are μακάριοι,” and on v. 11, “it is possible that Hebrews 11:26 and 1 Peter 4:14 refer to this expression.” Poole and Cambridge cite 1 Peter 4:13-14 at v. 12 for the same reason. ⚙ The vocabulary shared is ordinary, and “perhaps” is Pulpit's own word; we tier accordingly.
1 Peter 3:14 · 1 Peter 4:14
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G3107 μακάριος (in 49 vv) at 1 Peter 3:14 (0.21) and 1 Peter 4:14 (0.30, with G4151 πνεῦμα, in 344 vv). Both lexemes are common, so the verbal tier is not earned. The claim of literary dependence is Pulpit's, and he states it as a possibility, not a fact.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
The word Matthew chooses for the third beatitude, praus, he uses again only of Jesus: at 11:29, from Jesus' own mouth, “I am meek and lowly in heart,” and at 21:5, of the king coming to Zion. Cambridge makes the connection at this verse; JFB expands it, setting beside the beatitude both “Take My yoke upon you, and learn of Me; for I am meek and lowly in heart” and the apostle's appeal “by the meekness and gentleness of Christ.” ⚙ The consequence is that the promise of v. 5 is not an abstract reward for a temperament. The one who inherits the earth by not seizing it is first the speaker, and the disciples' inheritance is held in the same hands.
Matthew 11:29 · Matthew 21:5
eirēnopoios (G1518) is found here only in the New Testament; Pulpit notes that its cognate verb stands in exactly one other place, Colossians 1:20, “having made peace through the blood of his cross.” Ellicott draws the line the vocabulary invites: sonship was witnessed “in the work of ‘making peace’ between God and man, between Jew and Gentile, even at the price of shedding His own blood,” and those sharers in that work “should ... be recognised as sharers in that sonship.” JFB presses it further, and says this is the one beatitude whose ground could hardly have been found in the Old Testament, because “it was not till Christ ‘made peace by the blood of the cross’ that God could manifest Himself as ‘the God of peace.’” Gill, from the other side, restricts the human peacemaking to peace “between men and men,” because “Christ, in this sense, is the only peace maker.” ⚙ The two restrictions meet: the sons are called by the family likeness of a Father whose peacemaking they could not perform.
Colossians 1:20 · Matthew 5:9
Of all the Greek in this unit, the adjective at v. 7 is the most confined: eleēmōn stands in two verses only, Matthew 5:7 and Hebrews 2:17, where it describes the Son made like his brothers in every way “that He might become a merciful and faithful high priest.” ⚙ Our reading, offered as synthesis: the beatitude does not merely commend mercy, it names a quality which the New Testament elsewhere reserves for the priesthood of Christ, and promises that those who bear it will receive it. JFB has the theological order right, that God's exercise of mercy awakens ours and not the reverse, and quotes Trench's fine summary: the Christian “stands in a middle point, between a mercy received and a mercy yet needed.” The lexical narrowness is our contribution; the doctrine is the commentators'.
Hebrews 2:17
v. 10 gives the cause of persecution as heneken dikaiosynēs; v. 11 gives it, in the identical construction, as heneken emou. JFB alone in the brief presses on the substitution: “Here He identifies Himself and His cause with that of righteousness, binding up the cause of righteousness in the world with the reception of Himself. Would Moses, or David, or Isaiah, or Paul have so expressed themselves? Never. Whereas He that speaks, being Righteousness incarnate ... when He so speaks, speaks only like Himself.” Pulpit, independently, concludes from the same verse that the Messianic self-consciousness is already complete. ⚙ We note only that the argument rests on a grammatical parallel, not on a title: the claim is made by keeping the preposition and changing the object.
Matthew 5:10 · Matthew 5:11
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text. Three real textual questions touch this unit, all reported by the sources themselves. (1) Pulpit: “In some, especially ‘Western’ authorities, vers. 4, 5 are transposed,” and Ellicott agrees that “many of the best MSS. invert the order of Matthew 5:4-5”; Pulpit judges “far the greater balance of evidence is in favour of the usual order,” which our BSB text follows. (2) At v. 9, Pulpit reports that αὐτοί is “omitted by א, C, D, 13, 124, Latt., Peshito,” and thinks it genuine but possibly lost by accident. Our interlinear prints it. (3) At v. 11, Ellicott states that ψευδόμενοι, the word our versions render “falsely,” “is absent from the best MSS., and was probably added as a safeguard.” Barnes builds an argument on that very word. We have kept both in the record rather than choose between them. Pulpit also preserves Clement of Alexandria's variant at v. 10, “persecuted through righteousness (ὑπὸ τῆς δικαιοσύνης), for they shall be perfect.”
Sources. Every original-language fact above (surface forms, transliterations, Strong's numbers, parses, lexeme frequencies) comes from the unit brief's Berean interlinear and Verifier output, and every commentator sentence is a verbatim contiguous excerpt resolved from the raw text by anchor, never retyped. Matthew Henry's entry in this brief is a single block covering 5:3-12, so the sentence quoted at v. 5 is drawn from his treatment of the third character within that one block. Several entries in the brief are capped (Benson at v. 3, JFB at v. 3, Barnes at v. 5, Pulpit at vv. 3 and 5); nothing above depends on the capped remainder. JFB at v. 7 and Pulpit at vv. 3 and 10 are themselves quoting Trench and Wetstein, and we have said so in the editorial notes rather than let the borrowed judgments pass as theirs.
What is uncertain. The commentators openly disagree at v. 6 on whether dikaiosynē means imputed justifying righteousness (Gill) or entire conformity to the law of God (JFB, expressly rejecting the narrower reading); the accusative and the article settle neither, and we have not settled it either. The sense of praus at v. 5 is disputed even within one source: Pulpit argues against Weiss that the word bears on the relation to God and not only to men. The meaning of tēn gēn (the land, this earth, the new earth, or heaven) divides Barnes, JFB and Gill, and all three readings are recorded. No thread in this unit is tiered verbal across the Testaments: the Psalm 37:11 and Isaiah 61 links are real and named by multiple commentators, but shared Strong's numbers cannot be computed between the Greek and Hebrew lexicons, so those badges are held at structural and typological by method rather than by doubt. The two verbal badges (Hebrews 2:17, and the praus cluster) rest on rare shared lexemes within Greek and claim no quotation in either direction.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)