AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The same sermon in Luke, down to two of the rarest verbs in the New Testament verbal / quotation: confirmed
The parallel at Luke 12:22-31 is not a general resemblance but a shared vocabulary at the level of individual rare words. The Verifier's candidate list gives Luke 12:27 sharing νήθω (G3514, "to spin"), a verb that occurs in only two verses of the New Testament, and Luke 12:28 sharing κλίβανος (G2823, the portable clay oven), likewise in only two verses. Both pairs are this saying and its twin. Luke 12:25 shares μεριμνάω, προστίθημι and ἡλικίαν, the whole apparatus of v. 27. Cambridge notes that in Luke the passage follows the parable of the Rich Fool; Pulpit judges that "in the differences Luke preserves the more original form," while allowing that the connection with Matthew's context here "is so close" that Matthew may have it in place. ⚙ We record the verbal identity as fact and leave the question of priority where Pulpit leaves it, open.
Luke 12:22 · Luke 12:25 · Luke 12:27 · Luke 12:28
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G3514 νήθω (in 2 vv) and G2823 κλίβανος (in 2 vv), both exhausted by this saying and its Lucan parallel; also G3309 μεριμνάω (in 17 vv), G4369 προστίθημι (in 18 vv), G2244 ἡλικία (in 8 vv) at Luke 12:25. Greek to Greek.
μεριμνάω: the divided man, in Paul and in the hour of trial structural / thematic: confirmed
The verb that governs this unit is not common. The Verifier finds it in seventeen verses, and its other homes are telling. At 1 Corinthians 7:32-34 it describes the man divided between the Lord and the world, and Paul in the same breath calls him μεμέρισται, "divided": Ellicott and Pulpit both send the reader there, and Pulpit uses it for the popular derivation of the word from division. At Matthew 10:19 and Luke 12:11 the same verb is forbidden to disciples dragged before councils, "do not be anxious how or what you shall speak." ⚙ The two settings are the same problem at different pressures: what a man will trust when bread or speech is not in his own hands. We deliberately under-claim the tier here: the lexeme is genuinely shared and Verifier-confirmed, but seventeen verses is not the handful that would justify a verbal tier, and no passage quotes another, so we record a thematic link resting on a verified lexical basis.
1 Corinthians 7:32 · 1 Corinthians 7:33 · 1 Corinthians 7:34 · Matthew 10:19 · Luke 12:11
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G3309 μεριμνάω (in 17 vv), twice each at 1 Corinthians 7:32, 7:33, 7:34, Matthew 10:19 and Luke 12:11; Ellicott and Pulpit both name 1 Corinthians 7:32-34 explicitly. Greek to Greek, so a verbal tier was available, but at 17 verses the lexeme is not rare enough to carry one and no passage quotes another, so the tier is downgraded and the lexical basis recorded as it stands.
ἀρκετόν: what is enough for the day, the disciple, and the past life verbal / quotation: confirmed
ἀρκετόν (G713, "satisfactory, enough") stands in only three verses of the New Testament, and the three read as one thought held at three angles. Here it is enough trouble for one day. At Matthew 10:25 it is enough for the disciple that he be as his teacher, in a chapter that also forbids μεριμνάω. At 1 Peter 4:3 it is enough that the past time was spent as the Gentiles will, in a letter that will shortly tell its readers to cast their care on God. ⚙ Taken together the word marks the boundary of a sufficiency: enough suffering, enough status, enough of the old life, and in each case the point is that nothing further need be sought.
Matthew 10:25 · 1 Peter 4:3
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G713 ἀρκετός (in 3 vv), a rare word whose three New Testament occurrences are Matthew 6:34, Matthew 10:25 and 1 Peter 4:3. Greek to Greek.
Food and clothing: the forerunner who had already stopped worrying about both verbal / quotation: confirmed
The two nouns that frame v. 25, τροφή (G5160, food) and ἔνδυμα (G1742, garment), meet again in Matthew's own Gospel at 3:4, where John's ἔνδυμα was camel's hair and his τροφή locusts and wild honey. The Verifier records the shared lexemes, ἔνδυμα in only eight verses. ⚙ Matthew has already shown his readers a man whose food and clothing were exactly what the wilderness and its Maker supplied, before the Sermon ever asks anyone to consider birds. The link is Matthew's vocabulary, not a quotation, and we claim no more than that.
Matthew 3:4
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G5160 τροφή (in 16 vv) and G1742 ἔνδυμα (in 8 vv, counted twice at Matthew 3:4). Greek to Greek; a lexical link within one Gospel, not a citation.
Solomon: the king who asked first, and the king in all his glory structural / thematic: confirmed
v. 29 names the one figure in Israel's memory who could have settled the clothing question by wealth, and says he lost. Benson refers the glory to the ivory and gold throne of 1 Kings 10:18 and suggests the comparison is of whiteness, since eastern princes wore white robes (Esther 8:15; Daniel 7:9), a reading Barnes shares. Poole then sets the other Solomon story under v. 33: "it shall fare with you as it did with Solomon, 1 Kings 3:12, who asked not riches and honour, but had them," and Pulpit cites 1 Kings 3:11-14 at the same verse. ⚙ The unit therefore uses Solomon twice and in opposite directions: as the man whose glory was not enough, and as the man who sought first and had the rest added. JFB points to the same principle at 2 Chronicles 1:11-12. Because the Kings text is Hebrew and this Gospel Greek, there can be no shared Strong's lexeme, and we tier the link by figure and reference, never as verbal.
1 Kings 3:12 · 1 Kings 10:18 · 2 Chronicles 1:11
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so no shared Strong's lexeme is possible and no verbal tier is available. Basis is the named figure and the shared pattern of asking first: Benson cites 1 Kings 10:18, Poole cites 1 Kings 3:12 at v. 33, Pulpit cites 1 Kings 3:11-14, JFB cites 2 Chronicles 1:11-12.
Who feeds the ravens structural / thematic: confirmed
When Jesus tells them to look at the birds, He is not introducing a new idea to that audience. Gill sends the reader to Psalm 147:9, and notes that Luke's parallel specifies ravens; Pulpit adds Job 38:41, where the Lord's own questioning of Job asks who provides the raven his food. ⚙ The argument of v. 26 is therefore not an inference from nature but a reminder of something already written and already confessed: the same God who silenced Job with the raven is the Father the disciples now address. Greek to Hebrew, so the link is of motif and explicit citation by the commentators, not of vocabulary.
Psalm 147:9 · Job 38:41
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew): no shared Strong's lexeme is possible. Basis is the shared motif of God feeding the birds, cited explicitly by Gill (Psalm 147:9) and Pulpit (Job 38:41) on v. 26.
Bread for the day, and none kept for tomorrow typological
⚙ A figural reading, offered as such. The discipline of Exodus 16 is the exact shape of v. 34: manna gathered a day's portion each day, and what was stored against tomorrow bred worms. Israel is taught by forty years of eating that daily dependence is not a deficiency in the provision but its design, and the same paragraph of Matthew has just taught the disciples to pray for bread ἐπιούσιον (Matthew 6:11), which Ellicott here connects directly to this teaching: "The bearing of this teaching on the meaning of the 'daily bread' of the Lord's Prayer has already been noticed." This is a typological reading, widely held in Christian exposition, but no commentator in this brief makes the Exodus link explicitly, and no verbal basis is available across the testaments. We mark it as our own figure, not as a sourced claim.
Exodus 16:19 · Exodus 16:20 · Matthew 6:11
basis: Cross-Testament figure, no shared lexeme possible and none claimed. The one sourced element is Ellicott's link at v. 32 between this teaching and the daily bread of the Lord's Prayer; the manna pattern of Exodus 16 is our own figural reading, ancient in Christian tradition but not attested by the commentators in this brief.
Casting your care on Him: a much-cited link the Verifier does not confirm flagged: verify source
Cambridge cites 1 Peter 5:7 at v. 25 ("Casting all your care [or anxiety] upon him"), and Pulpit closes his note on v. 34 by sending the reader to Philippians 4:6 and 1 Peter 5:7; Ellicott, Barnes and JFB all cite Philippians 4:6 as well. The connection is theologically obvious and traditionally made. ⚙ But it is not in the Verifier's computed candidate list for this unit, and the reason is lexical: 1 Peter 5:7 carries the noun μέριμνα and the verb μέλει, not the verb μεριμνάω (G3309) that governs this passage, while Philippians 4:6 uses μηδὲν μεριμνᾶτε, which would be a real shared lexeme but does not appear among the candidates supplied to us. We therefore flag the pair rather than tier it: the commentators' citation is sourced and reported here, the verbal basis is not verified.
1 Peter 5:7 · Philippians 4:6
basis: Cited by Cambridge at v. 25 and by Pulpit at v. 34 (with Philippians 4:6 also cited by Ellicott, Barnes and JFB), but absent from the Verifier's thread candidates for this unit; 1 Peter 5:7 uses the cognate noun μέριμνα rather than G3309 μεριμνάω, so the verbal basis is unverified and no verbal tier is claimed.