“Do not judge, or you will be judged.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Mē krinete hina mē krithēte
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
Judging Others
Matthew 7:1–6 — Judging Others. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
“Do not judge, or you will be judged.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Mē krinete hina mē krithēte
For with the same judgment you pronounce, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
gar en hō krimati krinete krithēsesthe kai en hō metrō metreite metrēthēsetai hymin
Why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye but fail to notice the beam in your own eye?
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de Ti blepeis to karphos to en tō tou sou adelphou ophthalmō tēn de ou katanoeis dokon en tō sō ophthalmō
How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ while there is still a beam in your own eye?
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
ē pōs ereis tō sou adelphō Aphes ekbalō to karphos ek tou sou ophthalmou kai idou hē dokos en sou tō ophthalmō
You hypocrite! First take the beam out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
hypokrita prōton ekbale tēn dokon ek tou sou ophthalmou kai tote diablepseis ekbalein to karphos ek tou tou sou adelphou ophthalmou
Do not give dogs what is holy; do not throw your pearls before swine. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and then turn and tear you to pieces.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Mē dōte tois kysin to hagion mēde balēte tous hymōn margaritas emprosthen tōn choirōn pote mē katapatēsousin autous en tois autōn posin kai straphentes rhēxōsin hymas
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
The unit opens with Μὴ κρίνετε, a present imperative under the negative of the will, which the Pulpit Commentary renders with care: "not merely 'do not condemn,' for this would leave too much latitude; nor, on the other hand, 'do not ever judge,' for this is sometimes our duty; but 'do not be always judging.'" Every commentator in this brief feels the same pressure and narrows the verb the same way. Gill excludes civil magistrates, church discipline, and harmless private opinion, leaving "rash judgment, interpreting men's words and deeds to the worst sense." Barnes excludes the magistrate and notes that Luke 6:37 explains the word "in the sense of 'condemning.'" Poole gives five numbered classes of forbidden judgment and four classes of permitted judgment. JFB cuts to the disposition: "what our Lord aims at is the spirit out of which they spring."
Ellicott alone presses the difficulty honestly rather than dissolving it: "Must we not, even as a matter of duty, be judging others every day of our lives?" His answer is that our Lord "gives principles rather than rules, and embodies the principle in a rule which, because it cannot be kept in the letter, forces us back upon the spirit." That is the best account of the grammar available in this brief, and it is Ellicott's, not this tool's.
Verse 2 supplies the ground with two matched relative clauses, ἐν ᾧ κρίματι and ἐν ᾧ μέτρῳ, each running from a present active verb to a future passive. Cambridge names the shape: "the form which the 'lex talionis,' or law of reciprocity, takes in the kingdom of heaven." Gill shows the saying was already a commonplace, quoting the Mishnah's "with what measure a man measures, they measure to him" together with its catalogue of instances from Samson to Absalom; the Pulpit Commentary independently traces it to Sotah 1:7 and observes that the Revised Version drops "again" from the end of the verse on manuscript authority. Ellicott states the paradox that keeps the maxim from becoming mechanical: "the unjust judgment of man does not bring upon us a divine judgment which is also unjust; but the severity which we have unjustly meted out to others, becomes, by a retributive law, the measure of that which is justly dealt out to us."
The address now drops from plural to singular and the argument turns comic. κάρφος is a dry twig; δοκός is, in Barnes's words, "a large piece of squared timber." Both are wood, and the joke is scale. Ellicott records that the image was not original: "a proverb all but verbally identical is found as a saying of Rabbi Tarphon," and the Pulpit Commentary gives a rabbinic form from Bab. Bathra 15b in which each party tells the other to cast out his own mote. Gill adds two more from the Talmud, including R. Taphon's lament that no one in his generation would receive reproof. Benson states the proverbial value directly: twig and beam denoted "the one, small infirmities, the other, gross, palpable faults."
The verbs carry the weight the English cannot. You βλέπεις the twig, shallow sight; you do not κατανοεῖς the beam, which by the lexicon is "to observe fully" and by Cambridge marks "the contrast between judging from the outside, and examination of the heart." Cambridge claims the Greek prepositions of the next two verses carry the same contrast, ἀπό of the surface against ἐκ of the deep-seated root, though that claim depends on a manuscript reading at v. 4 which the brief's interlinear does not share, and the reader should weigh it accordingly.
Verse 5 names the man: ὑποκριτά, a stage-player. Ellicott gives the reason for the title, that he "acts the part of a teacher and reformer, when he himself needs repentance and reform the most," and then the sharpest sentence in the unit, that "the hypocrisy is all the greater because it does not know itself to be hypocritical." JFB calls the charge one our Lord makes "not without indignation," and draws the positive rule: "He only is fit to be a reprover of others who jealously and severely judges himself." Poole reaches the same place from the other side, that our charity in this kind "should begin at home." And then the promise, which the censorious never hear: διαβλέψεις, you will see through. The Pulpit Commentary notices what the verb governs. Not see the mote. See clearly to cast out the mote. Henry's summary of the whole movement is six words: "first reform thyself."
Verse 6 reverses direction so abruptly that Cambridge admits "the connection between this verse and the preceding section is not quite obvious," and JFB frames it as "the opposite extreme to that of censoriousness," namely "want of discrimination of character." Cambridge's formula is the neatest in the brief: "The Christian must be judicious, not judicial." The Pulpit Commentary agrees that recognising fundamental differences between men is not the censoriousness just forbidden.
What τὸ ἅγιον means is disputed in these sources. Ellicott, Gill and the Pulpit Commentary take it of consecrated sacrificial flesh, and Gill supplies the rabbinic maxim that holy things are not redeemed to be fed to dogs. Cambridge calls the allusion "very doubtful," and Barnes takes the word simply of "anything connected with religion." Who the dogs and swine are is disputed harder still. Geneva says flatly that "the stiff-necked and stubborn enemies of the gospel are unworthy to have it preached unto them." Barnes names them as classes of men, the snarling and the sensual. Poole keeps two possibilities open, tame sinners wallowing and malicious sinners barking. Ellicott refuses the personal identification altogether, arguing that the animals represent "not men and women as such, but the passions of this kind or that which make them brutish," and notes that Paul, who did not preach to the mob at Ephesus, would at another time have told any man in that crowd that he too was redeemed. JFB, who has just called the dogs "savage or snarling haters of truth," nonetheless warns against "too readily setting our neighbors down as dogs and swine, and excusing ourselves from endeavoring to do them good on this poor plea."
This edition does not settle that. Two things in the Greek are settled. The moods are unequal, καταπατήσουσιν future indicative against ῥήξωσιν aorist subjunctive, so that (as the Pulpit Commentary notes) the trampling is more certain than the rending. And Barnes's introverted parallelism, dogs and rending in the outer lines, swine and trampling in the inner, is a genuine reading of the word order that the grammar permits without requiring.
⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested against the text. Read the unit as one argument about eyesight and it stops contradicting itself. Verses 1 and 2 forbid a verdict. Verses 3 to 5 explain why: not because faults do not exist, but because the organ you would judge with is obstructed, and obstructed by the judging. Verse 6 then requires the very discrimination that verse 1 seemed to forbid. The resolution is not that Jesus permits a little judging after all; it is that διαβλέψεις is a promise. The man who casts out his own beam is not thereby retired from all assessment of others. He is qualified for it, and what he is qualified for is surgery, not sentencing: the verb governs "to cast out the mote," never "to see the mote." So the unit forbids the verdict and commands the cure, and puts self-knowledge between them as the only door.
Two consequences follow, and both cut. First, the beam is most probably the censoriousness itself, as the Pulpit Commentary suggests, which means the censorious man's disqualifying fault is invisible to him by its own nature: he is using the diseased organ to look for disease. Ellicott's line that the hypocrisy "does not know itself to be hypocritical" is the same observation from the moral side. Second, verse 6 is the most abusable sentence in the Sermon, and the brief's own authorities show how: Geneva reaches "unworthy to have it preached unto them" while JFB, in the same breath as his own harsh gloss, warns that the verse becomes a "poor plea" for refusing to do anyone good. A man who has just been called a stage-player for misreading a twig is in no position to start classifying his neighbours as swine. The order of the verses is itself the safeguard: nobody reaches verse 6 honestly who has not been through verse 5.
Not Scripture, an editorial line offered for testing: the beam is not merely in the eye of the judge, it is the judging, which is why he alone cannot see it.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
Luke 6:41-42 carries the same saying with the same rare vocabulary: κάρφος and δοκός occur in only five verses each in the whole New Testament, and those five are this passage and Luke's. κατανοέω (14 verses) is shared as well. Cambridge notes that the passage stands in Luke's report of the Sermon on the Mount "with a different context, and a further illustration of 'full measure,'" and the Pulpit Commentary lists Luke 6:41 and 6:42 as the parallels to vv. 3 and 4 respectively. Luke's version adds the vocative "hypocrite" at the same hinge.
Luke 6:41 · Luke 6:42
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G2595 κάρφος (in 5 vv) and G1385 δοκός (in 5 vv), both rare and effectively confined to this saying, plus G2657 κατανοέω (in 14 vv) and G3788 ὀφθαλμός (in 85 vv). Greek to Greek; a genuine verbal identity, not a quotation of one book by another
The measuring clause of 7:2 recurs at Mark 4:24 and Luke 6:38 with the same pair of rare words, μέτρον (12 verses) and μετρέω (9 verses). JFB names both places and says the maxim is used "as a great principle in the divine administration," with "a slightly different application" in Luke. The Pulpit Commentary notes that at Mark 4:24 the passive reference to God's own judging is "even more clear" than here, and Cambridge says Luke's context supplies "a further illustration of 'full measure.'" In Matthew the returned measure is severity; in Luke, on Cambridge's and JFB's reading of the different application, it is generosity. The same law runs both directions.
Mark 4:24 · Luke 6:38
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G3358 μέτρον (in 12 vv) and G3354 μετρέω (in 9 vv), both rare, at both refs; Luke 6:38 adds G1325 δίδωμι (in 378 vv, common, not load-bearing). Greek to Greek
Barnes sends the reader of 7:1 to Romans 2:1, and Ellicott to Romans 2:3, as apostolic echoes of the Master. Cambridge goes further and ties the noun: the κρίμα of 7:2 "is used Romans 2:2-3 of the divine sentence or decision: see that passage and context which are closely parallel to these verses." Poole cites the same chapter as Paul's exposition of the beam and the twig. The Verifier confirms a shared lexeme but only the common one, κρίνω, so the link recorded here is the structural one the commentators argue, not a scored verbal identity.
Romans 2:1
basis: Verifier pair check: shared Greek lexeme G2919 κρίνω (in 98 vv), too common to carry a verbal tier on its own. Cambridge separately attests that G2917 κρίμα stands at Romans 2:2-3 of the divine sentence; Barnes, Ellicott and Poole all name Romans 2 here. Tiered structural because the shared vocabulary is common and no citation is claimed
καταπατέω appears in only five verses, and the company is grim. It is the verb used of savourless salt trodden underfoot at Matthew 5:13 (which the Pulpit Commentary cross-references at this very word), of seed trodden down at Luke 8:5, of a crowd treading on itself at Luke 12:1, and at Hebrews 10:29 of trampling the Son of God underfoot. The verb that 7:6 uses to guard holy things from beasts is the verb the writer to the Hebrews uses for what men do to the Holy One himself. The lexeme list is the Verifier's; the wording of each of those verses should be checked in the text itself, since this brief supplies only the shared Strong's number.
Matthew 5:13 · Hebrews 10:29 · Luke 8:5
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G2662 καταπατέω (in 5 vv) at all three refs, a rare lexeme; Matthew 5:13 also shares G906 βάλλω (in 107 vv, common). Greek to Greek. Verbal identity of an uncommon word, not a quotation
κύων occurs in five verses only. Ellicott sends the reader to Philippians 3:2 and Revelation 22:15 as the type of impurity; Barnes to Philippians 3:2, 2 Peter 2:22 and Revelation 22:15 as "people of special sourness and malignity of temper"; Cambridge to 2 Peter 2:22 and Philippians 3:2; JFB notes the scavenging habits behind the image. Luke 16:21 supplies the remaining occurrence, where the dogs lick the sores of Lazarus and the term carries no invective at all. That last instance is a caution against reading the noun as automatic condemnation of persons.
Philippians 3:2 · 2 Peter 2:22 · Revelation 22:15 · Luke 16:21
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G2965 κύων (in 5 vv) at all four refs, a rare lexeme exhaustively listed; Philippians 3:2 also shares G991 βλέπω (in 117 vv, common). Greek to Greek
Ellicott reads τὸ ἅγιον as "the flesh which has been offered for sacrifice, the 'holy thing' of Leviticus 22:6-7; 22:10; 22:16, of which no unclean person or stranger, and a fortiori no unclean beast, was to eat." The Pulpit Commentary makes the same connection and adds Exodus 22:31, where flesh torn by beasts is precisely what is thrown to the dogs, so that the two halves of the law are the two halves of the saying. Gill supplies the rabbinic maxim "that they do not redeem holy things, to give to the dogs to eat." Cambridge dissents, calling the allusion "very doubtful" and citing Meyer. The link cannot be scored verbally: Greek and Hebrew do not share Strong's numbers, so no shared-lexeme basis exists across the Testaments even when the allusion is real.
Leviticus 22:10 · Exodus 22:31
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew): shared Strong's numbers cannot exist across the two lexicons, so no verbal tier is available in principle. Basis is the shared cultic pattern of consecrated flesh withheld from the unclean and cast to dogs, named explicitly by Ellicott (Leviticus 22:6-7, 10, 16) and the Pulpit Commentary (Exodus 22:31). Cambridge contests the allusion, which is why this is tiered structural and not higher
διαβλέπω is not the ordinary verb of sight. The Pulpit Commentary notes it recurs "in the right text of Mark 8:25, itself after the recovery of full power of sight," of a blind man whose sight has just been restored. ⚙ The resonance is suggestive: in Mark the verb marks the moment when partial sight becomes whole. Here it marks a sight that has to be earned by self-surgery. The Verifier's computed basis between the two verses is only the common word for eye, so the connection rests on the Pulpit Commentary's lexical observation rather than on a scored rare lexeme.
Mark 8:25
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G3788 ὀφθαλμός (in 85 vv), common, and therefore not sufficient for a verbal tier. The load-bearing point, that G1227 διαβλέπω itself stands in the preferred text of Mark 8:25, is the Pulpit Commentary's attestation and is not scored in the Verifier candidates
Ellicott names James 4:11 alongside Romans 2:3 and 1 Corinthians 4:5 as places where the apostles "echo the teaching of their Master," and the Pulpit Commentary cites James 2:12-13 and James 5:9 for the judging that is by God and at the last day. Benson reaches the same formula independently: "they must expect judgment without mercy, who have showed no mercy." The connection is real to these readers, but it is asserted by them and not scored: a Verifier pair check on Matthew 7:2 and James 2:13 returns no shared original-language lexeme at all. It is recorded here at the lowest tier for that reason.
James 2:13 · James 4:11
basis: Verifier pair check on Matthew 7:2 and James 2:13 returned no shared original-language lexeme; the Verifier's own note is that any connection is thematic and must be argued, not asserted. The link exists only as the named judgment of Ellicott (James 4:11) and the Pulpit Commentary (James 2:12-13; James 5:9). Flagged so the reader tests it rather than trusting it
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ The unit disqualifies every reprover on a single ground: the organ is obstructed. JFB states the positive rule that follows, "He only is fit to be a reprover of others who jealously and severely judges himself," and Ellicott observes that the disqualification is self-concealing, since "the hypocrisy is all the greater because it does not know itself to be hypocritical." Push that rule to its limit and it empties the office: every candidate reprover is himself under 7:3, and the fault that disqualifies him is the one fault he cannot see. ⚙ This tool's reading: the Sermon is not advice offered from inside the same predicament as its hearers. Its speaker is the one figure in the narrative whom the indictment of vv. 3 to 5 does not touch, and that asymmetry is what makes the passage a command rather than a shared complaint. JFB's own outline of the chapter notes where it ends, at 7:28-29, with the people astonished at his doctrine.
The commentators in this brief do not draw this christological conclusion; they stop at the moral rule. It is marked novel for that reason. What they do supply is its premise, unanimously.
Matthew 7:5 · Matthew 7:29
Ellicott reads τὸ ἅγιον as the consecrated flesh of Leviticus 22, which no unclean beast might eat, and says "to give that holy flesh to dogs would have seemed to the devout Israelite the greatest of all profanations." The verb of the consequence, καταπατέω, stands in only five verses, and one of them is Hebrews 10:29, where the object trampled underfoot is the Son of God. ⚙ The shared lexeme is a Verifier-computed fact, not an inference: the same rare word for what beasts do to holy things is the word Hebrews chooses for what men did to the Holy One. Read with Ellicott's cultic sense, the warning of 7:6 describes in advance what the Gospel will narrate, a holy thing handed over to those who trample it and then turn and tear. The difference is that Christ was not thrown; he was given, and given deliberately, which is the one case where the prohibition of 7:6 is overruled by the will of the Giver.
The verbal link is Verifier-scored. The christological application of it is this tool's, and the brief's commentators do not make it.
Hebrews 10:29 · Leviticus 22:10 · Acts 3:14
Cambridge records that pearls are "the only gems mentioned in the Gospels, twice named by Jesus: here, where they signify the deepest spiritual thoughts of God and heaven, and ch. Matthew 13:46, where 'the pearl of great price' is the kingdom of heaven itself." Geneva adds that the word "is now borrowed from that, to signify the most precious heavenly doctrine," and Barnes that the pearls here "denote the doctrines of the gospel." The identification of the pearl with the kingdom, and of the kingdom with the person of its King, is the settled reading of the parable among these authorities, and 7:6 assumes it: what is withheld from swine is not a rule of conduct but the treasure for which, three parables later, a man sells everything he has.
Matthew 13:45 · Matthew 13:46
Verse 1 forbids judging on the ground of a coming reciprocity, and every commentator here supplies the unnamed agent of the passive κριθῆτε: Cambridge, "by Christ on the Last Day"; the Pulpit Commentary, "by God, with special reference to the last day"; JFB, "at the great day"; Gill, "which will be the most awful and tremendous." ⚙ Two things follow that the brief's sources leave adjacent but do not join. The Judge of that day is the speaker of this sentence. And the same Gospel that records this sentence records its speaker standing under human judgment, silent, measured out to with the measure the world had (Matthew 27:11-26). The reciprocity of 7:2 is not suspended at the cross; it is absorbed there by the one person to whom nothing was owed. Benson's reading of the measure, "so we may, as it were, choose for ourselves, whether God shall be severe or merciful to us," states the terrifying half. The gospel's answer to it is that mercy was paid for, not chosen.
The last sentence is this tool's, and it goes beyond anything the ten commentators in this brief state here.
Matthew 7:1 · Romans 2:1
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text. The English base is the Berean Standard Bible; the word-by-word Greek, parsing and Strong's numbers are from the Berean interlinear as supplied in the brief. Two textual points inside this unit are noted by the sources themselves and are not settled here. At 7:2 the Pulpit Commentary observes that "again" at the end of the verse is absent from the manuscripts and was "naturally inserted by the copyists," the Revised Version omitting it. At 7:4 Cambridge builds an argument on reading ἀπό ("from the outside surface") where the brief's interlinear has ἐκ; Cambridge's contrast between the surface preposition at v. 4 and the inward ἐκ at v. 5 therefore rests on a reading this edition's interlinear does not carry, and the reader should treat that contrast as contested.
Sources. Ten public-domain commentators are quoted verbatim by anchor: Ellicott, Benson, Henry, Barnes, JFB, Gill, Geneva, Cambridge, the Pulpit Commentary and Poole. Henry's entry is his single Concise note on 7:1-6 and is repeated by the source across all six verses; it is quoted once. Poole's note on 7:3 and 7:4 is only a cross-reference to his note on 7:5, and Geneva's entries on 7:2, 7:3, 7:4 and 7:5 are bare repetitions of the Authorised Version text with no gloss, so those authors appear only where they actually comment. Gill's rabbinic citations (Pirke Aboth, Sotah, Bab. Bathra, Temurah, and the Mischar Happeninim) are reported as Gill gives them and have not been independently checked against the rabbinic sources.
What is uncertain in this unit. First, the referent of "the dogs" and "the swine" at 7:6 is genuinely disputed among these authorities. Geneva identifies them with persons, "the stiff-necked and stubborn enemies of the gospel," and calls those persons unworthy of preaching. Barnes and Poole also identify classes of men. Ellicott expressly refuses that identification and reads the animals as "the passions of this kind or that which make them brutish." JFB gives a harsh gloss and then warns against the very use Geneva makes of it. This edition reports the dispute and does not adjudicate it. Second, whether τὸ ἅγιον alludes to sacrificial flesh (Ellicott, Gill, Pulpit) or means spiritual truth simply (Cambridge, citing Meyer against the allusion; Barnes) is likewise open. Third, whether the beam of 7:3-5 is the gross sin of the censor (Gill) or his censoriousness itself (Pulpit) changes the force of the passage and is not resolved by the grammar.
Machine layer. Everything marked ⚙, including the sola reading, the pullquote, the argument that the beam is the judging, and all four Christ entries, is this tool's fallible synthesis and carries no authority. Three of the four Christ entries are marked novel because the brief's commentators do not draw them. The threads to Luke 6:41-42, Mark 4:24 with Luke 6:38, the καταπατέω group and the κύων group rest on Verifier-computed rare shared lexemes. The Romans 2:1 and Mark 8:25 threads are tiered structural because their computed bases (κρίνω in 98 verses, ὀφθαλμός in 85 verses) are too common to carry a verbal claim, whatever the commentators assert. The Leviticus and Exodus thread cannot be scored verbally at all, because Greek and Hebrew do not share Strong's numbers. The James thread is flagged: a Verifier pair check returned no shared lexeme whatever, and it stands only on Ellicott's and the Pulpit Commentary's assertion.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)