When Jesus arrived at Peter’s house, He saw Peter’s mother-in-law sick in bed with a fever.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai ho Iēsous elthōn eis Petrou tēn oikian eiden tēn autou pentheran beblēmenēn kai pyressousan
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
Jesus Heals at Peter’s House
Matthew 8:14–17 — Jesus Heals at Peter’s House. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
When Jesus arrived at Peter’s house, He saw Peter’s mother-in-law sick in bed with a fever.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai ho Iēsous elthōn eis Petrou tēn oikian eiden tēn autou pentheran beblēmenēn kai pyressousan
So He touched her hand, and the fever left her, and she got up and began to serve Him.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai hēpsato tēs autēs cheiros kai ho pyretos aphēken autēn kai ēgerthē kai diēkonei autō
When evening came, many who were demon-possessed were brought to Jesus, and He drove out the spirits with a word and healed all the sick.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de Opsias genomenēs pollous daimonizomenous prosēnenkan autō kai exebalen ta pneumata logō kai etherapeusen pantas tous echontas kakōs
This was to fulfill what was spoken through the prophet Isaiah: “He took up our infirmities and carried our diseases.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
hopōs plērōthē to rhēthen dia tou prophētou Ēsaiou legontos elaben Autos tas hēmōn astheneias kai ebastasen tas nosous
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
Matthew's Greek gives the scene one finite verb before the miracle: εἶδεν, "he saw." Pulpit reads the parallels carefully and concludes that no one had yet told him about her, "Presumably on entering, before they asked him about her," while Ellicott reports Luke's sharper picture, that the household "asked Him about her, as if consulting about a case of which they almost despaired." The two are not in conflict: he sees, and then they ask. What he sees is described by a perfect participle of a violent verb, βεβλημένην, which Cambridge renders "Literally, struck down," and by a present participle of a verb that occurs in only two verses of the Greek New Testament, πυρέσσουσαν, still burning. Gill, following Luke, calls the distemper "very raging and furious."
Then a chain of four verbs, each of which the English smooths. He fastens onto her hand (ἥψατο, aorist middle, from a root the lexicon defines as "to attach oneself to"). The fever releases her (ἀφῆκεν, transitive, with her as its object, the same verb Matthew uses of forgiven sin). She is raised (ἠγέρθη, aorist passive). And then the tense changes: διηκόνει, imperfect, not a single act but a continuing one. Pulpit is the only commentator in this brief who reads the tense shift as intentional, contrasting "the single act of arising from her bed and her continued ministry at the meal," and cross-referencing Matthew 4:11, where angels minister to Christ after the temptation. Ellicott notes what does not happen: "The 'great fever' had not left behind it its usual sequel of weakness and exhaustion." Poole draws the plainest moral: that she could rise "argued her cure miraculous; that she did do it, argues her sense of Christ's goodness, and thankfulness."
The genitive absolute Ὀψίας γενομένης is not atmosphere. Ellicott, Barnes, Gill and Pulpit converge on one explanation: it was the sabbath, and the sick could not lawfully be carried until it ended at sundown. Gill supports this at length from the Jerusalem Talmud on the three stars by which nightfall was judged, concluding that "they could not, according to their canons, bring them sooner." Ellicott offers the alternative, that evening was simply cooler, and then sets it aside in favour of the sabbath reading. Barnes independently notes that "On the Sabbath they would not even bring their sick to be healed," but as soon as it closed, "they came in multitudes."
Two details of method are recorded. First, λόγῳ, a bare anarthrous dative: by a word. Pulpit sets it "In contrast to saying over them the long formulas of exorcism used by others," and Poole identifies the power as "the same power by which he made the world and all things therein." Cambridge adds the observation that there was no touch here at all, since "Christ never laid his hand on demoniacs," a generalization worth flagging, because Poole on this same passage records from Luke 4:40 that he laid his hands on the sick that evening. The distinction Cambridge is drawing is between the demonized and the merely ill, and it survives that objection, but it is Cambridge's synthesis rather than Matthew's statement. Second, πάντας, all. Pulpit puts the whole weight there: "None were so ill as to be beyond his power." The Geneva margin takes the adjective distributively, "Of all sorts." The Greek permits both, and we should not pretend it decides.
Matthew then does something he has done before and will do again: he reaches for Isaiah. The clause is a purpose clause, ὅπως πληρωθῇ, aorist passive subjunctive, and the sources disagree openly about how much it claims. Benson concedes the least, that Matthew uses the prophet "in a lower sense than that primarily intended by the prophets," adding that such usage is "elegances rather than imperfections." Poole states the difficulty as sharply as any critic could: the words "neither seem truly quoted, nor doth the sense appear the same," since Isaiah speaks of sins and Matthew applies the line to bodies. His answer is the evangelists' known habit, that they "took themselves only concerned to keep to the sense, not exactly to the words." Barnes goes the other way and claims the Greek here "is an exact translation of the Hebrew," arguing that both nouns mean bodily disease and that neither refers to sin. Gill holds both ends at once, and produces the rabbinic evidence that Isaiah 53 was read messianically by Jews themselves, citing Sanhedrin 98b on the messianic name "a leper."
Pulpit presses hardest, and its reading is the one that takes the emphatic pronoun Αὐτὸς most seriously: "He wrought his miracles at his own expense, and that expense the greatest." Ellicott had already framed the same point: not a rich man scattering alms, but one who "Himself 'took' and 'bore' the sufferings which He removed," which is why Ellicott finds Mark's and Luke's note about Jesus seeking solitude at dawn "entirely in harmony" with the verse. The two verbs are not synonyms: Pulpit distinguishes the transference (ἔλαβεν) from the oppressiveness of the load once borne (ἐβάστασεν), and Gill pictures the shoulder taking the weight.
⚙ Our own fallible reading, offered to be tested against the text. Matthew has arranged this unit so that the smallest scene explains the largest. A woman is thrown down and burning; he grips her hand; the fever lets go; she is raised; she serves. That is the shape of the evening that follows, in miniature: a whole town thrown down, a word, release, and Matthew reaching for the prophet to say what it cost. The hinge is the emphatic pronoun in v. 17, Αὐτὸς, a word the Greek did not need. Matthew puts it there because his claim is not that Jesus has a remedy but that Jesus has a shoulder. The verbs he quotes are lifting verbs, and the second one, ἐβάστασεν, is the one that keeps carrying after the lifting is done.
We hold this under Sola Scriptura with two stated limits. First, the sources genuinely disagree about how far Matthew's use of Isaiah 53:4 reaches, and we do not resolve it: Barnes confines it to bodies, Benson calls it a lower sense, Poole and Gill and Pulpit extend it toward the cross. Second, nothing in the Greek of v. 15 asserts a resurrection; the passive ἠγέρθη is the ordinary verb for being got up, and it would be an overreach to build doctrine on it. What we will say is smaller and, we think, defensible: Matthew chose the raising verb rather than the standing verb, and the first thing the raised woman does is the thing the angels did for Christ in 4:11. In this Gospel, being lifted and serving are the same motion seen twice.
He did not carry a cure to the sick; he carried the sick. (⚙ synthesis, not a verse)
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
This is the strongest verbal link in the unit, and the Verifier's basis is unusually clean. The participle πυρέσσουσαν (G4445) occurs in only 2 verses of the Greek New Testament: here and at Mark 1:30. The noun for mother-in-law, πενθερά (G3994), occurs in 5. Luke adds πυρετός (G4446, 6 verses) and Mark 1:31 adds the raising and serving verbs (G1453, G1247). Poole lays out the differences without flattening them: Mark says he took her by the hand and lifted her up, Luke says he stood over her and rebuked the fever, and "Here is no contradiction, only some amplifications of the story." JFB declines to expound Matthew at all here, sending the reader to Mark 1:29-34.
Mark 1:30 · Mark 1:31 · Luke 4:38 · Luke 4:39
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G4445 πυρέσσω (in 2 vv, effectively unique to this pericope), G3994 πενθερά (in 5 vv), G4446 πυρετός (in 6 vv), plus G1453 ἐγείρω and G1247 διακονέω at Mark 1:31. Greek to Greek throughout. The link is synoptic parallel, not one text citing another.
Matthew's construction in v. 15 is not unique to him. At John 4:52 the nobleman's household reports the hour when ἀφῆκεν αὐτὸν ὁ πυρετός, the same noun and the same verb of release. At Acts 28:8 Publius's father lies with fever, and Paul lays hands on him, pairing πυρετός with χείρ. Three healings of fever in three books, and each records the hand or the hour, as though the point being preserved in every case is the exactness of the moment the fever let go. Gill in this unit makes the same observation from the other side, that Luke has Jesus rebuke the fever "Just as he did the winds and sea."
John 4:52 · Acts 28:8 · Luke 4:39
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G4446 πυρετός (in 6 vv) with G863 ἀφίημι at John 4:52 and Luke 4:39; G4446 with G5495 χείρ at Acts 28:8. Greek to Greek, New Testament only. Rare noun, hence the verbal tier; no text quotes another.
πενθερά (G3994) is a rare word: 5 verses in the Greek New Testament. Two of them are this healing and its Markan parallel. Two more are Matthew 10:35 and its Lukan counterpart Luke 12:53, where Christ says he has come to set a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. ⚙ The observation is ours and we keep it modest: the one in-law relation Matthew names as healed by the touch of Jesus is the same relation he later names as sundered by the claim of Jesus. We are not asserting that Matthew intended the echo. We are noting that the vocabulary is scarce enough that the two passages stand out against each other, and that nothing in the brief's sources draws the connection.
Matthew 10:35 · Luke 12:53
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G3994 πενθερά (in 5 vv), a rare noun, linking Matthew 8:14 to Matthew 10:35 and Luke 12:53. Greek to Greek. The verbal link is certain; the thematic irony drawn from it is ⚙ synthesis and is marked as such in the body.
Verse 16 is built from a cluster of words Matthew reuses whenever he describes the sick being brought. Compare 4:24, where they bring him all τοὺς κακῶς ἔχοντας and the demonized; 12:22, where a demonized man is brought and healed; 15:22, where the Canaanite woman's daughter is badly demonized. Barnes on this verse and Pulpit both cross-refer the reader back to 4:24 for the meaning of possession, and Poole says outright, "We before, Matthew 4:24, showed who were meant by persons possessed by devils." The Verifier confirms the shared vocabulary, though none of the individual lexemes is rare enough to score a verbal link on its own; what is real here is the recurrence of the whole cluster, which is a habit of composition rather than a citation.
Matthew 4:24 · Matthew 12:22 · Matthew 15:22 · Matthew 10:1
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G1139 δαιμονίζομαι (in 13 vv), G2560 κακῶς (in 16 vv), G4374 προσφέρω (in 45 vv) across Matthew 4:24, 12:22, 15:22; G1544 ἐκβάλλω with G4151 πνεῦμα and G2323 θεραπεύω at Matthew 10:1. Greek to Greek within one book, so a verbal tier would be grammatically available. We decline it and tier this structural deliberately: not one of the shared lexemes is rare (13, 16, 42, 45, 75 and 344 verses respectively), and the repetition is Matthew's own editorial idiom rather than one verse citing another. Under-claiming is the safer error here.
Verse 17 is an explicit, formulaic citation: Matthew names Isaiah and quotes him. The sources are unanimous that the source text is Isaiah 53:4 and divided about the rendering. Pulpit states flatly that the quotation is "from the Hebrew." Barnes claims "The Greek in Matthew is an exact translation of the Hebrew, and the same translation should have been made in both places," faulting the English versions rather than Matthew. Poole concedes that the words "neither seem truly quoted, nor doth the sense appear the same" and defends the evangelist on the ground of sense rather than wording. Poole and Gill both bring 1 Peter 2:24 alongside, where the same prophecy is applied to sins borne on the tree, and Poole concludes that "This scripture was twice fulfilled in Christ."
The tier here is a deliberate under-claim. The citation is explicit and formulaic, which would ordinarily be the strongest kind of link. But it crosses from Greek into Hebrew, and shared Strong's lexemes cannot be computed across the two lexicons, so no verbal score exists to record. We tier it structural and say why.
Isaiah 53:4 · 1 Peter 2:24
basis: Explicit named citation (Matthew's fulfilment formula, ὅπως πληρωθῇ τὸ ῥηθὲν διὰ Ἠσαΐου). Cross-Testament: Greek to Hebrew, so shared Strong's numbers cannot be computed and no verbal tier can be scored. Commentators in the brief report that Matthew renders the Hebrew rather than following the Septuagint (Pulpit: "from the Hebrew"; Barnes calls it an exact translation of the Hebrew; Poole grants the wording is not exact). 1 Peter 2:24 applies the same prophecy to sins, which Poole and Gill both note.
⚙ A figural reading, offered as such. Mark's parallel has Jesus raise her by the hand; Matthew has the passive ἠγέρθη, she was raised, followed by the imperfect διηκόνει, she kept serving. Pulpit is the source that notices the tense contrast and that sends the reader to Matthew 4:11, where angels minister to Christ after the temptation using this same verb. We read the sequence as a pattern rather than a prediction: in this Gospel, being lifted by Christ issues in diakonia, and the word for what she does is the word the church will later take for its servants. We flag this as novel in its wording. The homiletic version of it is old and common, but none of the ten commentators in this brief states it in these terms, and Matthew makes no such claim himself.
Mark 1:31 · Matthew 4:11
basis: Verifier basis at Mark 1:31: shared Greek lexemes G1453 ἐγείρω (in 138 vv) and G1247 διακονέω (in 32 vv), both common. Matthew 4:11 shares G1247 as Pulpit cross-references on this verse. The verbal ground is weak (common lexemes), so the link is offered as figural, not verbal, and marked novel in wording.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
The claim of v. 17 is not that Christ had a remedy for sickness but that he took sickness onto himself. The emphatic nominative Αὐτὸς, unnecessary in Greek, carries the point; the two verbs are lifting verbs. Ellicott: "It was not merely that He came, as one of boundless wealth, who might scatter alms broadcast, but that He Himself 'took' and 'bore' the sufferings which He removed. He suffered with those He saw suffer." Pulpit states the mechanism most strongly: not magic, not power exerted externally, but "himself bearing the sicknesses that he removed. He wrought his miracles at his own expense, and that expense the greatest." Poole holds the two fulfilments together, the bodily healings here and the guilt borne on the tree at 1 Peter 2:24. Gill demonstrates from Sanhedrin 98b and other rabbinic sources that Isaiah 53 was read messianically within Judaism itself, so the application is not a Christian novelty imposed on the text. Benson alone restrains it, allowing the healings only "a lower sense" beside the highest sense of the cross. That restraint is part of the record, not an objection to it.
Isaiah 53:4 · 1 Peter 2:24 · John 1:29
Read across chapter 8, Matthew is cataloguing methods, and the commentators noticed. Gill: "Sometimes he healed by a word, as the centurion's servant; and sometimes by a touch, as here; and sometimes by both, as the leper." Cambridge sets v. 16 against v. 15 on exactly this axis, the word without the touch for the demonized. Pulpit adds the pastoral reason for the touch here, that with her as with the leper "the word alone would not have been enough," because the faith in that room was below the centurion's. ⚙ Our reading of the pattern: authority in this chapter is not a single technique but a person who adjusts to what the sufferer can bear. The centurion needed no contact and said so; the leper and the fevered woman were reached with a hand. Henry draws the figure inward, that in spiritual healing "the Scripture speaks the word, the Spirit gives the touch," which we record as his reading rather than Matthew's statement.
Matthew 8:3 · Matthew 8:8 · Luke 4:40
⚙ A reading we offer for testing. Four of the ten commentators here (Ellicott, Barnes, Gill, Pulpit) independently explain the genitive absolute of v. 16 by the sabbath: the sick could not lawfully be carried until sundown, so the town waited at the boundary of the day. Gill documents the rule from the Jerusalem Talmud down to the three stars. The theological weight of that observation is not drawn out by any of them, and we draw it out with care. Matthew places a crowd of the afflicted outside a legal line, held there by the day of rest, until the sun sets and they may be brought to the one who will later say in this same Gospel that the Son of Man is Lord of the sabbath. The law that gave the rest also delayed the mercy. We mark this as novel in this form, and we claim nothing about Matthew's intention: the sources supply the fact of the sabbath, and the inference is ours.
Matthew 12:8 · Mark 1:32 · Leviticus 23:32
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text. Base text BSB (CC0) with the Berean interlinear and Strong's numbering. One textual variant is recorded in the sources for this unit: at 8:15 Cambridge notes "There is high MS. authority for 'unto Him'" in place of "unto them," and Pulpit reports the Revised Version reading "him, with manuscripts." The interlinear supplied in the brief has the singular dative αὐτῷ, "Him." Readers should know the plural stands in the older English versions. At 8:16 Pulpit also notes the Revised Version's "a word" against "his word"; the Greek λόγῳ is anarthrous, which favours the Revised reading.
Sources. Ten public domain commentators were available for this unit. JFB contributes no exposition at all here, referring the reader wholesale to Mark 1:29-34, so no JFB excerpt appears in this synthesis; that is a gap in our coverage, not an omission by choice. Geneva supplies only a brief marginal gloss at 8:14 and 8:16 and nothing at 8:15 or 8:17. Henry's note is a single block covering 8:14-17 rather than verse by verse. Ellicott, Benson and Barnes are absent from 8:15 or 8:16 in part because their notes are grouped across verse ranges.
What is uncertain. The central interpretive question of this unit, how far Matthew's citation of Isaiah 53:4 extends, is genuinely unresolved among the sources and we have not resolved it. Barnes confines both nouns to bodily disease and denies any reference to sin; Benson permits only "a lower sense"; Poole, Gill and Pulpit extend the verse toward the atonement. We have reported the disagreement rather than choosing. Gill's rabbinic citations (Sanhedrin 98b, Zohar, Pesikta) are given at second hand from his own footnotes and we have not verified them; Pulpit, treating the same Talmudic saying, warns of "Raymund Martini's false reading, 'the Sick One,'" which is a live caution about how that material has been transmitted in Christian polemic. Cambridge's identification of Luke's "great fever" with typhus is nineteenth century medical inference, not a statement of the text. Cambridge's claim that "Christ never laid his hand on demoniacs" is a generalization across the Gospels rather than an exegesis of this verse, and Poole on this same passage records from Luke 4:40 that hands were laid on the sick that evening.
⚙ layer. Every reading marked ⚙ in this unit is ours and fallible: the mother-in-law irony in the threads, the raised-and-serving typology, and the sabbath reading under Christ. Each is flagged in place. The interlinear data, the parse tags, the lexical glosses, the thread bases and every quotation are sourced and were not generated here.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)