When Jesus had entered Capernaum, a centurion came and pleaded with Him,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de autou Eiselthontos eis Kapharnaoum hekatontarchos prosēlthen autō parakalōn auton
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Faith of the Centurion
Matthew 8:5–13 — The Faith of the Centurion. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
When Jesus had entered Capernaum, a centurion came and pleaded with Him,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de autou Eiselthontos eis Kapharnaoum hekatontarchos prosēlthen autō parakalōn auton
“Lord, my servant lies at home, paralyzed and in terrible agony.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai legōn Kyrie ho mou pais beblētai en tē oikia paralytikos deinōs basanizomenos
“I will go and heal him,” Jesus replied.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Egō elthōn therapeusō auton Kai legei autō
The centurion answered, “Lord, I am not worthy to have You come under my roof. But just say the word, and my servant will be healed.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de ho hekatontarchos Apokritheis ephē Kyrie eimi ouk hikanos hina eiselthēs hypo mou tēn stegēn alla monon eipe logō kai ho mou pais iathēsetai
For I myself am a man under authority, with soldiers under me. I tell one to go, and he goes, and another to come, and he comes. I tell my servant to do something, and he does it.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
gar egō kai eimi anthrōpos hypo exousian echōn stratiōtas hyp’ emauton kai legō toutō Poreuthēti kai poreuetai kai allō Erchou kai erchetai kai tō mou doulō Poiēson touto kai poiei
When Jesus heard this, He marveled and said to those following Him, “Truly I tell you, I have not found anyone in Israel with such great faith.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de ho Iēsous Akousas ethaumasen kai eipen tois akolouthousin Amēn legō hymin heuron oudeni par’ en tō Israēl tosautēn pistin
I say to you that many will come from the east and the west to share the banquet with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de legō hymin hoti polloi hēxousin apo anatolōn kai dysmōn kai anaklithēsontai meta Abraam kai Isaak kai Iakōb en tē basileia tōn ouranōn
But the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de hoi huioi tēs basileias ekblēthēsontai eis to to exōteron skotos ekei estai ho klauthmos kai ho brygmos tōn odontōn
Then Jesus said to the centurion, “Go! As you have believed, so will it be done for you.” And his servant was healed at that very hour.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai ho Iēsous eipen tō hekatontarchē Hypage hōs episteusas genēthētō soi kai ho autou pais iathē en ekeinē tē hōra
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
Matthew opens with a genitive absolute, Εἰσελθόντος αὐτοῦ, "on his entering," and does not even name Jesus; the Revised Version, as Pulpit notes, prints "he." Into that unemphatic entry walks a ἑκατόνταρχος. Cambridge identifies him as most likely an officer of Herod Antipas rather than an imperial legionary, and Ellicott sets him beside Cornelius of Acts 10:1 as a soldier on whom the life of Judaism had made its mark, pointing to Luke 7:5 and the synagogue he built. His petition has no request in it. He states a case: ὁ παῖς μου βέβληται, my boy has been thrown down and lies there, δεινῶς βασανιζόμενος, being terribly tortured. Pulpit's one line is the best comment on the grammar: "Observe that the statement of the case is itself a petition." Cambridge notes that pais is "a more affectionate term than the word translated servant in Matthew 8:9," and Ellicott observes that pity for a sick slave was itself unusual in that world. Already the man is doing two things Israel was not doing: loving a slave, and expecting something from Jesus without saying what.
Jesus answers with an emphatic pronoun: Ἐγὼ ἐλθὼν θεραπεύσω αὐτόν. Pulpit fixes the stress precisely: "The emphasis is not on the coming, but on the person who comes." Gill notices that the offer exceeds the request, since "his presence was not asked, and yet he offered it." The centurion then refuses the offered visit, and his refusal is the faith Jesus praises. οὐκ εἰμὶ ἱκανὸς is not first a claim about morals but about measure: he does not come up to it. Barnes reads the confession as personal rather than merely ethnic, "the expression of a conviction of the great dignity and power of the Saviour," and Gill turns it on the reader, asking how much more unworthy sinners are that Christ should enter their hearts. Then the request itself, μόνον εἰπὲ λόγῳ, with no article: only speak, by a word. Ellicott: he "had risen above the thought of a magic influence, operating by touch or charm, to that of a delegated power depending only on the will of Him who possessed it." Gill hears Psalm 33:9 behind it and says the request ascribes omnipotence. The reasoning in v. 9 is a soldier's: καὶ ἐγὼ, I also am a man under ἐξουσία. Ellicott draws out the logic of delegation, Cambridge suspects the man knew the Jewish teaching on ministering angels, and Gill insists the argument runs from lesser to greater, since "Christ was subject to none." Note that his ladder ends not with a marching soldier but with a slave who accomplishes: Pulpit asks whether "and to my slave" is the climax of his faith.
ἐθαύμασεν: He marveled. Poole concedes that "admiration agreed not to Christ as God, but as man it did"; Benson grounds it in "a real human, as well as a real divine nature"; Pulpit refuses Augustine's escape that Christ only commended what was admirable without actually wondering, because that "brings an unreality into parts of our Lord's conduct." Then the verdict, sealed with the Hebrew Ἀμὴν at the head of His own sentence, and the reading Pulpit prefers is sharper than the common one: with no man in Israel have I found so great faith. Gill draws the christological conclusion that Jesus commends rather than rebukes a man who has ascribed to Him a power peculiar to God. From the one Gentile Jesus moves to the many: πολλοὶ ἥξουσιν, they will arrive, ἀπὸ ἀνατολῶν καὶ δυσμῶν, from the sun's rising and setting, and ἀνακλιθήσονται, they will be seated at table with the patriarchs. Ellicott sees in the centurion "the first-fruits of the wide harvest of the future"; Geneva calls the verb "a metaphor taken of banqueters"; Pulpit traces the banquet image to Isaiah 25:6 and calls it common in Jewish teaching; Gill adds that Jesus is contradicting a rule his hearers lived by, that a Jew should not sit at table and eat with Gentiles. The counter-stroke is v. 12. Ellicott calls "sons of the kingdom" a Hebraism for "the natural heirs who had forfeited their inheritance"; Barnes explains that the phrase was their own self-description. They are ἐκβληθήσονται, thrown out, using the compound of the very root under beblētai in v. 6. Geneva states the geometry: "in the kingdom is light, and outside the kingdom is darkness."
The dismissal is one word, Ὕπαγε, and the miracle is one more, γενηθήτω, an aorist passive imperative from the verb of coming-into-being. Gill hears the creation fiat in it. Between them stands ὡς ἐπίστευσας, and Poole will not let the comparative slip into a cause: "As thou believest, not because thou believest. Our faith is not meritorious of the least mercies." Benson says the same, that faith was the means and not the meritorious cause. Ellicott catches the aorist: "Better, As thou didst believe, referring to his one great act of faith." The report closes with the verb the centurion had used, now in the aorist passive, ἰάθη, in that hour. Poole is honest about what he cannot establish, that he does not know how far this soldier knew the Scriptures; Barnes is anxious that there be "no imposition or deception." The Evangelist is interested in neither question. He records that a word was asked for, a word was given, and the distance between Capernaum's streets and a slave's sickbed turned out not to exist.
⚙ Read under Sola Scriptura and offered to be tested: the unit is built on one Greek root doing opposite work. In v. 6 the boy βέβληται, has been thrown down inside the house; in v. 12 the heirs ἐκβληθήσονται, will be thrown outside the house. Between those two castings stands a man who declines to have Jesus cross his threshold and asks instead for a bare word, and the word crosses what the feet were not asked to cross. What Jesus calls faith here is not intensity of feeling and not knowledge of the covenant (Poole confesses he cannot say how much of the Scriptures this man knew). It is a judgment about authority: that Jesus stands where a command is the same thing as the event. The centurion reasons to it from the only order he knows, the chain of rank, and reasons correctly, which is why Jesus marvels. And the reversal in vv. 11 and 12 is not arbitrary. Those who are thrown out are thrown out of a lit hall where a table has been laid, and the ones who are seated there are seated, passively, by someone else; the verb anaklithēsontai is a passive in Greek, and nobody at that table seated himself. A title without trust ends in the dark; trust without a title ends at the table. We do not press this into a system: Matthew gives a scene, not a doctrine of election, and Poole's warning that it is "Many, not all" is a limit worth keeping.
The word went where the feet were not asked to go. (This line is our own reading, not Scripture.)
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
Luke 7:1-10 carries the same episode, and the Verifier's candidates show why the link is verbal and not merely thematic: Luke 7:6 shares ἑκατοντάρχης (G1543), εἰσέρχομαι (G1525) and οἰκία (G3614) with this unit, and Luke 7:7 shares παῖς (G3816), λόγος (G3056) and ἰάομαι (G2390). The saying about the roof and the word stands in both in nearly the same Greek. The difference is the messengers: Ellicott notes that in Luke the centurion "never came at all in person, but sent first the elders of the Jews, and then his friends," and Pulpit judges Luke's account "more likely than St. Matthew's, which is not only compressed, but, if taken by itself, gives a wrong idea of what appears to have actually taken place," then defends Matthew with Trench's "exchange of persons." Barnes canvasses the possibility of two separate incidents and rejects it: "It is very difficult to believe that all these circumstances would coincide in two different stories." JFB simply refers the whole passage to Luke and holds that it belongs chronologically to a later stage.
Luke 7:6 · Luke 7:7
basis: Greek to Greek. Verifier: shared lexemes G1543 hekatontarchēs (in 20 vv), G1525 eiserchomai (184 vv), G3614 oikia (85 vv) at Luke 7:6; G3816 pais (24 vv), G3056 logos (318 vv), G2390 iaomai (26 vv) at Luke 7:7. The same saying in substantially the same wording, not a quotation of one by the other but a parallel transmission of one utterance.
Verses 11 and 12 appear in Luke attached to a different occasion and in the reverse order, after the warning to mere professors. The Verifier records ἀνακλίνω (G347, only six verses in the New Testament) and ἀνατολή (G395, ten verses) shared with Luke 13:29, and Ἀβραάμ with Ἰακώβ shared with Luke 13:28. Pulpit states the relation flatly in his heading: "Vers. 11, 12, equivalent to Luke 13:28, 29," and concludes that "St. Matthew does not place these verses in their historical connexion" but joins them here to make the miracle teach that Gentiles accept Christ though Jews reject Him. Ellicott offers the alternative, that our Lord repeated Himself, "entirely after our Lord's manner," and that Luke, writing for Gentiles, kept the words for their later occasion. Either way the verbal identity is not in doubt; the arrangement is.
Luke 13:28 · Luke 13:29
basis: Greek to Greek. Verifier: G347 anaklinō is rare (in 6 vv) and is shared with Luke 13:29, along with G395 anatolē (10 vv) and G932 basileia; Luke 13:28 shares G11 Abraam, G2384 Iakōb, G932 basileia. Same dominical saying in both, with the order of the two halves reversed.
τὸ σκότος τὸ ἐξώτερον with ὁ κλαυθμὸς καὶ ὁ βρυγμὸς τῶν ὀδόντων is not a stock phrase of the New Testament; it is Matthew's. The adjective exōteros (G1857) occurs in three verses only, all of them in this Gospel: here, Matthew 22:13 where the guest without a wedding garment is bound and thrown out, and Matthew 25:30 where the unprofitable δοῦλος is thrown out. Klauthmos (G2805, nine verses) and brygmos (G1030, seven verses) recur with it at Matthew 13:42, 13:50 and 24:51. Ellicott counts the combination six times in Matthew and once in Luke and notes the articles, "the weeping par excellence." Pulpit observes that in every case the phrase contrasts the place into which the wicked are sent with the one they might have enjoyed. The recurring victim in this formula is never an outsider: it is a guest, a slave of the household, a son of the kingdom.
Matthew 22:13 · Matthew 25:30 · Matthew 24:51
basis: Greek to Greek, within one Gospel. Verifier: G1857 exōteros is rare (in 3 vv: this verse, Matthew 22:13, Matthew 25:30); G2805 klauthmos (9 vv) and G1030 brygmos (7 vv) are shared across Matthew 22:13, 24:51, 25:30, 13:42 and 13:50. A fixed Matthean formula, not a citation.
στέγη (G4721, "a roof") appears in only three verses of the New Testament, and one of the other two is Mark 2:4, where friends unroof a house to lower a παραλυτικός (G3885, nine verses) to Jesus. Both lexemes are shared. The two scenes are the inverse of each other: in Mark the roof must be broken open because faith believes the sick man has to be got into the presence; in Matthew the roof is named only to say that the presence is not required. Barnes and Ellicott both work hard to identify the particular form of palsy in view here, since δεινῶς βασανιζόμενος implies acute pain, which Benson notes is not usual in a palsy. We claim no literary dependence between the two passages, only that Matthew's readers had a vocabulary of roofs and paralytics already, and this scene uses it to opposite effect.
Mark 2:4
basis: Greek to Greek. Verifier: shared G4721 stegē, rare (in 3 vv), and G3885 paralytikos (in 9 vv). The shared rare noun is real, but the connection we draw is of contrasting pattern, not of quotation or dependence, so we tier it structural rather than verbal.
When Jesus says the many will be reclined with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, He is speaking a known language. Pulpit states the source: "The image, taken from Isaiah 25:6, is exceedingly common in Jewish Haggadic teaching," and lists Malachi 1:11, Isaiah 59:19, Jeremiah 16:19 and Zechariah 8:22 as the background for the coming from east and west; Poole cites Isaiah 25:6-8 for the banquet and Isaiah 11:12 and Isaiah 43:5-6 for the gathering. Barnes says the phrase "from the east and from the west" in Scripture denotes the whole world, citing Isaiah 45:6 and Isaiah 59:19. No shared Strong's number can support this link, because the Matthean text is Greek and the prophets are Hebrew; Matthew records no formula of citation here and Jesus quotes nothing word for word. What is shared is a picture: a feast on a mountain for all peoples, and the scattered brought home from the sunrise and the sunset.
Isaiah 25:6 · Isaiah 43:5 · Malachi 1:11
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's lexemes are not available as a basis and no verbal tier is possible. Recorded basis: the commentators themselves name the sources, Pulpit citing Isaiah 25:6 for the banquet image and Malachi 1:11 with Isaiah 59:19 for east and west, Poole citing Isaiah 25:6-8, Isaiah 11:12 and Isaiah 43:5-6. Shared motif of an eschatological feast and an ingathering, with no quotation claimed.
ἀνατολή (G395, ten verses) and δυσμή (G1424, five verses) are paired only a handful of times in the New Testament. The Verifier finds both lexemes at Matthew 24:27, where lightning comes out of the risings and shines to the settings at the coming of the Son of Man, and at Revelation 21:13, where the city's gates face the risings and the settings alike. The same pairing that here measures the reach of the ingathering measures there the reach of the advent and the openness of the city. Barnes reads the pairing in this verse as a Scriptural way of saying "the whole world."
Matthew 24:27 · Revelation 21:13
basis: Greek to Greek. Verifier: shared G395 anatolē (in 10 vv) and G1424 dysmē, rare (in 5 vv), at both Matthew 24:27 and Revelation 21:13. A shared verbal pairing, not a quotation of one text by another.
Ellicott, on v. 6, thinks it probable that the centurion "had heard specifically of the healing of the 'nobleman's son' at Capernaum recorded by St. John (John 4:46-54)" and that "there he had found a precedent which now determined his own line of action." Pulpit, on v. 5, points the other way and sends the reader to Trench "for the contrast between this and the superficially similar miracle recorded in John 4:46, sqq." The two episodes do share a town (Capernaum), a healing at a distance, a word spoken, and a report of the hour; they differ in the petitioner's rank, his presence, and the patient. No Verifier candidate links them, and we have no shared-lexeme basis to offer. We therefore record the link as disputed rather than settling it, and we do not use it to interpret either passage.
John 4:46
basis: Contested. The identification or dependence is asserted as probable by Ellicott and denied as merely superficial by Pulpit (following Trench); no Verifier candidate supplies a shared-lexeme basis for the pair. Flagged rather than tiered.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ The centurion asks for the one thing that only God can give by asking: μόνον εἰπὲ λόγῳ, only speak with a word. Gill names the register exactly, reaching for Psalm 33:9, "he spake, and it was done, he commanded, and it stood fast," and says the request is "ascribing omnipotence to him." Ellicott says the man had risen above the idea of a healing influence operating by touch or charm to "a delegated power depending only on the will of Him who possessed it." And Jesus answers in that same register: γενηθήτω, an aorist passive imperative from ginomai, the verb of coming-into-being, let it be brought to be. Gill hears the creation fiat. The decisive fact for the reader is not that a healing happened but that Jesus accepted the terms: He did not correct a man who treated His speech the way Genesis treats God's. Gill presses this into a proof of deity, arguing that Christ would have rebuked rather than commended the man had the ascription been false. That inference is Gill's; the text reports the commendation and leaves the reader to draw it.
Matthew 8:8 · Matthew 8:13
⚙ Jesus does not treat the centurion as an exception but as a sample. Ellicott: "It is clear that our Lord saw in the centurion the first-fruits of the wide harvest of the future," and what He says here "contained, by implication, the whole gospel which St. Paul preached to the Gentiles." Geneva reads the whole episode as designed for that, that Christ "by setting before them the example of the uncircumcised centurion and yet of an excellent faith, provokes the Jews to jealousy, and together forewarns them of their being cast off and the calling of the Gentiles." Gill supplies the covenantal mechanism from Galatians 3:9: those who are of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham, so the Gentiles sit with the patriarchs on the same terms the patriarchs sat, and "the faith of Old and New Testament saints, Jews and Gentiles, is the same." Benson adds that the many come into "the gospel covenant established with Abraham." The Christ who is praised by a Gentile here is the Christ in whom the nations are seated, passively, at a table they did not set.
Matthew 8:11 · Galatians 3:9 · Acts 10:1
⚙ There is an irony in this scene that the commentators touch without pressing. A man says οὐκ εἰμὶ ἱκανὸς ἵνα μου ὑπὸ τὴν στέγην εἰσέλθῃς, I am not sufficient that you should come in under my roof, and he is right; and the one he says it to has already come in under a roof, and will keep coming. Gill takes the step nearest to this: if this man was unworthy that Christ should be "though but for a short time, under his roof," how much more unworthy are sinners "that Christ should come into their hearts, and dwell there by faith, as he does, in all true believers." Cambridge, on v. 9, calls this "the first contact of Jesus with slavery," and it is worth noticing what that contact consists of: a word spoken on behalf of a slave, at the request of the slave's owner, by one whom Paul would later describe as taking the form of a slave. We offer the incarnational extension as our own reading, not as the commentators'. The text itself says only this much, and it is enough: the sufficiency was never on the threshold's side, and the word came in anyway.
Matthew 8:8 · Matthew 8:9
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
⚙ Honesty notes for this unit. (1) Matthew and Luke. Matthew reports the centurion coming and speaking in person; Luke 7:3-6 has him send Jewish elders and then friends, and say expressly that he was not worthy to come. Ellicott, Poole, Pulpit and Barnes all address the divergence; Pulpit prefers Luke's as the more likely account and defends Matthew by Trench's "exchange of persons," Barnes rejects the theory of two distinct incidents, and JFB writes no exposition at all here, referring the reader to Luke 7 and stating that the episode "belongs to a later stage" than Matthew's arrangement suggests. We have not adjudicated this, and our notes on v. 5 do not assume either reconstruction.
(2) Arrangement of vv. 11-12. These two verses stand in Luke 13:28-29 in the reverse order and in a different setting. Pulpit concludes that Matthew has moved them here for thematic reasons; Ellicott holds that our Lord repeated Himself. We record both and adopt neither.
(3) Text. Pulpit reports an early "Western" reading at v. 11, "in the bosom of Abraham," and at v. 12 the variant ἐξελεύσονται ("they shall go out") for ἐκβληθήσονται, which would make the exclusion the heirs' own act; he also notes that Westcott and Hort and the Revised Version margin read v. 10 as "With no man in Israel have I found so great faith." Our literal renderings follow the Berean interlinear as supplied in the brief, which prints ἐκβληθήσονται and, at v. 12, lists the article τὸ twice before the adjective; the Greek runs τὸ σκότος τὸ ἐξώτερον, noun with article, then adjective with article, and our note on index 9 reflects that.
(4) παῖς or δοῦλος. Matthew uses pais at vv. 6, 8 and 13 and doulos at v. 9; Luke 7:2 uses doulos for the sick man. Gill concedes that pais "more commonly signifies a 'son' or 'child'" and settles the question from Luke. Cambridge and Pulpit both note the affectionate register. BSB prints "servant" for both Greek words, which is why our divergences flag it.
(5) The John 4:46-54 question is disputed between Ellicott (probable precedent) and Pulpit following Trench (only superficially similar). It is tiered "flagged: verify source" in the threads and is not used as evidence anywhere else in this unit.
(6) Sources consulted. Ten public-domain commentators are present in the brief; Henry's note covers the whole of 8:5-13 in a single block and JFB's is a cross-reference stub, so both are quoted once only and with that limitation stated. Barnes' entry at v. 13 is capped in the brief (about a thousand further characters not shown); we did not open the full text, and the material we cite from him at v. 13 lies inside the portion supplied. All thread bases marked "Verifier" come from the computed candidate list; where no Verifier basis exists (the Isaiah and Malachi links, the John 4 link) we say so and lower the tier accordingly.
(7) What we do not know. Whose army this centurion served in (Cambridge and Pulpit say Herod Antipas', Benson and Barnes assume Rome's), what the disease actually was (Barnes: "the particular form... is not mentioned"), and how much of Israel's Scriptures the man had read. Poole is the most honest on the last point: "How far this centurion was acquainted with the oracles of the Old Testament... I cannot tell."
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)